Laserfiche WebLink
explained it is a fire exit with exit only hardwarf' • <br /> Staff lounge could be centrally located in each house . <br /> Provide foyer for auditorium, the dining facility is acting as that now but <br /> if there is a barrier there will be congestion. <br /> There is a writing surface that can be applied directly to wall surfaces <br /> which may be cheaper than a framed unit but they were unable to get more <br /> information on that . <br /> Integrate the library closer to the academic wing . She feels presently <br /> there are several barriers . <br /> Simplify- the library plan, the band room plan and dining facility for <br /> faculty. <br /> Ian explained none of these ideas are cast in stone . They are benchmarks <br /> for other ideas to get back to the baseline . <br /> Peter asked how much is in the budget for value added? <br /> Paul explained 1/2 million for value added and 1/2 million for design <br /> changes . <br /> Ian also stated the sewage treatment plan is estimated at $850 , 000-900 , 000 . <br /> His consultant thinks it may be closer to $500-600 , 000 and Steve Greelish <br /> agreed but now it is just a matter of opinion. <br /> Paul said he talked with Chartwell about developing the report in different <br /> categories- value added to the project , cost savings to the budget . The <br /> report lacks that. . It looks at the construction cost issue but he does not <br /> see anything that talks about value added. We have to knot,- where the value <br /> is . <br /> Bill Cottrell said they will develop that information later , time was short <br /> during the workshop . They were concentrating on reducing the cost to get <br /> down to the budget . <br /> Paul said the Committee needs the other component in order to make choices . <br /> He said Chartwell ' s charge is to give the Committee a value analysis . <br /> Getting down to the budget is the charge of the architects . <br /> Ian said he is not saying that information will not be made available . If <br /> any of these items are not acceptable to the Committee , why proceed with a <br /> value analysis . <br /> Janice said she feels like this is the second meeting in a row where she is <br /> operating in a vacuum. Should the Committee do their homework and then <br /> respond to the report next week? If not it is stupid to have a Committee <br /> of towns people . <br /> SMMA' s report ha 4 categories- <br /> We concur with the recommendation. <br /> Needs further evaluation. <br /> Requires owner direction. <br /> We do not concur/recommend . <br /> Ed Frenette said the first step is to see if the Committee concurs with the <br /> items SMMA concurs with. <br /> Paul asked SMMA if they had any other items they will be discussing other <br /> than this list? They have not identified additional items as of today. <br /> The full document lists the advantages and disadvantages of each <br /> recommendation. <br /> 6 <br />