Laserfiche WebLink
They will send a letter to the Selectmen and include a copy of Bob <br /> Whritenour ' s letter to the property owner . <br /> Paul said there was a similar problem during the site selection process . <br /> At that time Town Counsel said in the worst case , if we entered the <br /> property we would be liable for restoration . In this case restoration <br /> won ' t be necessary because we will end up owning the property . <br /> Bob Whritenour said he will take care of getting access to the property . <br /> Peter suggested setting a goal date for completion of the appraisals , <br /> September 1 ? <br /> Bob will discuss this with the appraiser to see if he can meet the Sept . 1 <br /> date. <br /> Dan Solien was present to discuss with the Committee boundary delineations <br /> for acquisition purposes . <br /> He outlined on the plan a possible acquisition line . <br /> The line is obvious at Rte 151 and along Old Barnstable Road . <br /> The eastern boundary line is not as definitive . <br /> Dan suggested the Committee consider the fact a lot of the land on the <br /> eastern side is conservation land or restricted in some way from <br /> development. If they allow Cornish to hang on to that land they could <br /> possibly swap it for developable land in the future . The school could then <br /> move their acquisition line up the slope a little . <br /> Paul said at one time Fields Pint considered putting a road there , is it <br /> all conservation land? <br /> Dan said it is not . The Committee should take only the land that is out <br /> side of the conservation land . <br /> The Committee agreed they do not want to leave Fields Point enough land to <br /> put a road in there . <br /> Will the southeasterly portion of land be land locked , making it valueless <br /> to Cornish? <br /> Paul said it is their choice to donate the property to the performing arts <br /> center , creating the land lock . Under the present scheme, that portion of <br /> land is not land locked . <br /> Peter said his goal is to minimize cash expenditure. <br /> Dan presented 2 options to the Committee : <br /> - a line straight across , 20-30 feet south of the track/football field . <br /> - an angled line , minimizing the acquisition costs. <br /> What are the setback requirements? <br /> Bill Hauck said it is residential land . 30 ft should be sufficient, 15 <br /> feet is too close. <br /> Bill Martiros suggested extending the line another 20 feet , why crowd it . <br /> Paul said the school will never do anything with the back of the <br /> ballfield/track . There is nothing to gain by taking more land . Why crete <br /> an issue with the performing arts center . We are already into their lot by <br /> 50 ft. <br /> 2 <br />