Laserfiche WebLink
a variance for the parking space size requirement. <br /> They want to reduce the width of the stall from 10 feet to 9 feet. <br /> The Committee did not agree to reduce the number of spaces down to 300 . At <br /> this point, the Committee is not sure what the right number is . <br /> -The reduction in tennis courts is from 9 to 6 not 10 to 6 . <br /> - eliminating the practice football field is a future issue . <br /> - irrigation system needs review. The Committee does not know how much is <br /> there now. <br /> - ballfield lights , will remain but may become an alternate . The <br /> infrastructure for the lights should definitely be there . <br /> Bob Fournier said they need to review these items with the Committee to <br /> proceed with design development. They cannot design the site without <br /> knowing how many parking spaces there will be . <br /> Bob explained the first step was to reach consensus with Chartwell on the <br /> value management recommendations , reach consensus on the 2 sets of notes. <br /> Now, the second step is to reach consensus with the Building Committee . <br /> Ian said he attempted to take everyone ' s comments and suggestions and <br /> prepare a report. However , it was the Committee ' s intention to talk about <br /> design at this meeting . <br /> Steve suggested identifying key requirements impeding the architects and <br /> proceed with these decisions . <br /> Paul said , after reviewing all recommendations, they were within $500 , 000 . <br /> He felt comfortable with that because there were some categories that were <br /> based just on sq foot costs . It did net seem fair to cut from, for <br /> example , the site when so many departments were not subject to that <br /> scrutiny . we are forcing the design based on the budget. <br /> Ed said he is comfortable if the Committee is comfortable . It is close <br /> enough to the budget for this phase . <br /> Peter asked when on the timeline they need to be at $ 110 per sq foot? <br /> Bob replied at the end of the design development phase - scheduled to be <br /> completed Sept 166th . They will then give the documents to Chartwell and to <br /> SMMA ' s cost estimators . That will take about 2 weeks . Then they will <br /> return to the Committee with cost models . <br /> Paul feels comfortable proceeding the way we are going . <br /> Norris will present the progress they have made to date on the building <br /> based on value engineering comments . They will discuss what can be decided <br /> at a later date , what can be deleted and what they feel strongly needs to <br /> be there . <br /> Dan Solien agreed with Paul and Ed , we should move ahead , but he needs <br /> clear direction on parking to move forward with design development. <br /> SMMA ' s recommendation is to pursue 300 spaces . Reduce student and faculty <br /> by 100 spaces each . <br /> Paul said the Committee needs input to make a decision . <br /> Dan does not have information to justify that number of spaces . He can <br /> show , or, the plan , how to reduce from 500 to 300 spaces . <br /> Paul asked what is driving the reduction , need or budget? He is riot <br /> convinced it wasn ' t done because of budget. That is not the way to design a <br /> 4 <br />