Laserfiche WebLink
for the building , he does not want to see them cost more but he <br /> wants everyone to be aware that SMMA will be coming back for <br /> more . <br /> Paul asked Joel the design time to get these items completed? <br /> Joel said they will start the site work immediately because it <br /> will take 2 months for MEPA review. That should be done within <br /> next 2-3 weeks at most . <br /> Paul asked if all design could be completed in 4 weeks? Joel said <br /> probably a little longer . There are parts that will need <br /> approval by the Committee . They will work as quickly as they can <br /> to get it done . <br /> Paul asked if the Committee wants to wait on this issue until <br /> they hear from SMMA on their additional fee request? <br /> Merry Sue said it is two issues . She wants to vote on this <br /> tonight . <br /> Steve agreed . Vote on this issue tonight . The Committee will <br /> adjust their perspectives now on later requests . <br /> Ian asked about the pricing of the change orders , does this <br /> include detailed analysis , unit pricing? <br /> Paul said this is not a wavier form the contract requirement . <br /> They have to provide details . <br /> * Paul made a motion to forward to the Selectmen for their <br /> approval an additional fee for SMMA of $92 , 905 for <br /> additional services related to incorporating the value <br /> added items to the current project , as voted by the <br /> Committee . Merry Sue seconded the motion. <br /> Discussion: <br /> Bill said he does not feel the Committee should pay them ! <br /> If Daedulus is in error , he should pick up that fee . <br /> Paul said , under SMMA ' s contract , the Committee does not have a <br /> leg to stand on -( to not pay them) . <br /> Bill thinks there is room for negotiating , at least . They have <br /> developed the concepts , spent time on these items , that should be <br /> deducted from the fee . <br /> Joel said they did look at what the actual work is , this is not <br /> to start from nothing . <br /> Peter said the Committee did "buy" the plans , as they were , when <br /> they went out to bid . However , he wants everyone to understand <br /> there will be extra claims . <br /> Merry Sue said that issue is separate from this one . <br /> Tom Wren said , in the contract , if it is deemed a change order <br /> occurs only because of something the architects left out , then <br /> that fee is taken out . If the Committee ' s motion can include <br /> wording subject to SMMA' s contract ; there is a mechanism in the <br /> contract in case there is doubt that work is being done twice <br /> (work already done ) . <br /> Paul said he also reviewed the contract . It is clear this is an <br /> 8 <br />