Laserfiche WebLink
Article 25 continues: If <br /> Mr Buckingham: I really feel the intent of your amendment, hovrever if you <br /> are renting a one bedroom house that consists of six people; this is not <br /> going to work. To go by a family unit, does not mean anything. <br /> Mr Swart : I had the experience of buying a house which was approved by <br /> by the inspectors and everything else. When I moved the contractor � . <br /> certainly did not carry out the plans that were called for. It <br /> cost me a couple thousand dollars to correct the situation, which I <br /> did. I do not think a single family is going to rent to another single <br /> family where the septic system can not take care of it. I think you <br /> are bringing too much regulation into the lives of the people of <br /> Mashpee. We do not want these regulations. <br /> Moderator: On the motion to amend, All those in favor say aye; opposed no <br /> Ayes have it. On the Article as amended, any discussion <br /> Mr Malone: I have a ,problem with the enforcement of this; 30-35/ of the <br /> homes in Mashpee are rented. This Article does not have any money on it <br /> it is going to cost us money in the end. When you get a : 5.00 fee, this <br /> does not even get you into a car. <br /> Mr Buckingham: Through the County Health, there is a cadet or learner <br /> available to us. We would not hop=scotch through Town. We think we can <br /> make it work. <br /> Mrs Muse: I wonder who is liable for this X300.00 fine, the owner? I � <br /> Mr O'Connell: This is aserious problem, and it should be looked at. i ! <br /> I received anArticle that specifically deals with rentals of unrelated <br /> people. The "so-called group rental" is where the problem lies, not <br /> with indivival home-owners. That problem has to be addressed. This <br /> �h <br /> Article is too broad for me. I would suggest it be redrafted. <br /> Moderator: All in favor as amended say aye; opposed no. <br /> Motion does not carry. <br /> .,I i <br />