1988-1990-ZBA APPEALS (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i MASHPEE BOARD OF APPEALS r i Minutes • January 24, 1990 I The Mashpee Board of Appeals held a meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, January 24, 1990 at the Mashpee Town Hall. Board members present and acting throughout were: Cheryl' A. Hawver, Michael A. Makunas, Richard E. Halpern, Edward M. Govoni and John J. Friel. Florence A. Wall - (Owner of record: Geoffrey T. Wall) - Requests a Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to change and expand a non -conforming structure in an R-5 zoning district on property located at 146 Ninigret Ave, (Map 65, Block 79) Mashpee, MA. Florence A. Wall - (Owner of record: Geoffrey T. Wall) - Requests a Variance under Sections 174-28A and 174-31 of the Land Space Requirements for permission to vary the setbacks in an R-5 zoning district on property located at 146 Ninigret Ave. (Map 65, Block 79) Mashpee, MA. Members sitting: C. Hawver, M. Makunas, R. Halpern Mr. Charles Spohr represented the Applicant. He explained that the Conservation Commission had no objections to the plans. He informed the Board that the Applicant was requesting permission to build a new sundeck, living room addition and a small deck. They will be removing 204 sf of 10 existing deck space. The additions will result in an increase of 236sf. Mr. Makunas and Mr. Halpern questioned an earlier petition on this property and requested the 1988 files. They reviewed the earlier plan and said that a tool shed on the property was to have been removed. This Decision granted a Variance of 16' from Ninigret and a 4' Variance from Canonchet Ave. Mr. Halpern explained that only one Variance was now needed on the setback from Sakonnet Drive. Mr. Makunas questioned if the front stairs had been included in the lot coverage figures or setback measurements. Mr. Spohr replied that part of the plan had been done by an architect and he was not certain if stair measurements had been included. Mr. Friel questioned the lot coverage and Mr. Spohr estimated it at 16.53%. Mr. Makunas asked that replies to the following questions be submitted to the Board: 1. are the stairs included in the lot coverage figures? 2. do the setback figures include the stairs? 3. has the tool shed been removed? Mr. Makunas moved to take the applications under advisement pending receipt of revised plans and satisfactory answers to the above questions. Mr. Halpern seconded. All agreed. Mr. Makunas suggested that new drawings reflect accurate lot coverage and be signed as a revised plan to be included with the Decision.