My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-1998-APPEALS MINUTES
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1996-1998-APPEALS MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2018 4:04:33 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:39:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Appeals Minutes— October 14, 1998 4 <br /> Mr. Regan informed Mrs. Williams that the zoning by-laws have been changed to require <br /> a minimum of 80,000 square feet. Mr. Govoni stated that the Town Planner's Article in <br /> 1986 reads that if someone owns three lots contiguous in the same name, the owner has <br /> to sell the lots together. No comments were received from abutters. <br /> Mr. Govoni moved to continue the hearing. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. <br /> John L. & Cynthia J. West -Request a Variance from Section 174-32 of the Zoning By- <br /> laws for permission to construct an addition to an existing dwelling on an unpaved road <br /> on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 26 Russell Road (Map 120 Block 29), <br /> Mashpee, MA. <br /> John L. & Cynthia J. West -Request a Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the <br /> Zoning By-laws for permission to construct an addition to a non-conforming single- <br /> family dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 26 Russell Road (Map <br /> 120 Block 9), Mashpee, MA. <br /> Members sitting: Edward M. Govoni, James E. Regan III and Robert G. Nelson. <br /> David Sanicki of Cape& Islands Engineering represented the applicants and submitted <br /> revised plans showing 6.8% lot coverage. Mr. Sanicki stated that the in-law apartment is <br /> planned for elderly parents to move into after selling their current home. The Board of <br /> Health has approved the proposal to relocate an existing septic system. The Conservation <br /> Commission has also approved the entire project, with orders of conditions pending <br /> approval from the Board of Appeals. The new plans are to connect the existing house <br /> with a two-car garage and a roof extender to a one-bedroom apartment beyond the <br /> garage. Mr. Sanicki stated that he made a mistake when filing the application and <br /> neglected to include the request to construct an in-law apartment (174-25.A.8 of the <br /> zoning by-laws). <br /> Mr. Govoni informed Mr. Sanicki that the application for a Variance to construct an <br /> addition on an unpaved road will require the owners to install a sprinkler system. He went <br /> on to read the by-law regarding conversions to accommodate not more than two-families <br /> in a dwelling. The by-law reads"that there is not external evidence of occupancy by <br /> more than one family and further provided that each dwelling unit resulting from such <br /> conversion shall not have less than 750 square feet of habitable floor space." Mr. Govoni <br /> stated that the proposal appears to be a two-family home and questioned if the applicant <br /> could resubmit plans that changed the external appearance to look more like a single- <br /> family dwelling. Mr. Sanicki offered a few suggestions to change the appearance. Mr. <br /> Govoni recommended that the applicant resubmit plans with appropriate modifications as <br /> well as showing the location of Monomoscoy Road. No comments were received from <br /> abutters. <br /> Mr. Govoni moved to withdraw the application for a Variance. Mr. Regan seconded. All <br /> agreed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.