Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Houle found that the Petitioner did not establish a <br /> hardship unique to the particular property, and that a granting of <br /> an additional use to the property would be detrimental to the Town. <br /> Mr. Houle also established that to grant the request for a <br /> variance, as presented to the Board, would not be in harmony with <br /> the general purpose and intent of the ordance or by-law, as the plan <br /> submitted to the Board was inadequate. <br /> Mr. Makunas and Mr. Slavinsky found that the Petitioner <br /> established a hardship unique to the particular property, and that <br /> a granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general <br /> purpose and intent of the ordance or by-law, and would not be <br /> detrimental to the Town. <br /> y <br /> -2- <br />