1988 AUG-DEC-ZBA APPEALS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SP-88-09-071 Page 2. i" ;r y The locus of the project consists of five acres of land situated at Route 28 and Great Neck Road, southwest of Donna 's Lane. Said site has frontage of 346 feet on Route 28, and is approximately 1, 100 feet in depth. The zoning is C1SV, and the Petitioner elected Cl zoning district pursuant to Mashpee Zoning By-law Section 4 . 8 . The property is shown as Lots 7 and 12 on Mashpee Assessor's Map 74 . Representing the Petitioner, in addition to the aforementioned Michael A. Dunning and Walter Yarosh, was Robert - Raymond of Arrow Engineering, and John Taylor, who is associated with the Petitioner, and who addressed operational issues associated with the project. ' In its presentation, the applicant represented to the Board of Appeals that the project was not intended to be a time-sharing project, that units would not be used as year-round dwelling units, but rather as motel units only. The Petitioner also indicated that the original plan had no restaurant or clubhouse facilities, but, at the suggestion of the Board of Appeals and the Design Review Committee, that the present project constituted a full-scale motel with complete facilities, including restaurant and clubhouse facilities . The Petitioner's plans were shown on plans "Mashpee Motel, Mashpee, Massachusetts" dated September 28, 1988, by Yarosh Associates Wood Frame Building Construction 51,420 square feet . The Board reviewed the plans and determined that the plans met the specific requirements required by the Mashpee Zoning By- Law as set forth in Section 9 . 2 . Specifically, the Board found that frontage requirements, front, rear and sideyard requirements, landscaping, parking, unit size and height restrictions, all as set forth in Section 9 . 2, were fully complied with. The Board also found that there is a need for a full-service motel in .the central area of the Town of Mashpee, noted that the number of units had been scaled down from the original plan, from 93 to 70, and that the redesigned plan was far superior to the original plan. The Board also took into account Petitioner's representation as to the proposed use of the premises, and considered the fact that the project had already been through the Design Review Committee, and that other approvals would be required from other State and local boards . Based on all of the evidence, the Board of Appeals found that the proposed project was in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Mashpee Zoning By-Laws , and consistent with its specific provisions . The Board also found that the inclusion of a restaurant, not to exceed 100 seats, and a clubhouse facility, are also consistent with the project and was also in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the By-Laws and consistent with its specific provisions .