Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals Pamela E. Terry SP-90-23 2. <br /> The Board of Appeals, after carefully considering all of the facts <br /> and evidence submitted at the hearing, made the following findings: <br /> 1. the Board considered the parking facilities inadequate and <br /> considered that a minimum of four spaces per hole would be <br /> required as stated in the By-laws for bowling alley <br /> requirements. The Board found this to be an appropriate <br /> analagous use. <br /> 2. the proposed use would significantly increase traffic on <br /> Route 28, already considered a road requiring critical <br /> planning. The applicant advised an estimated 300-trip <br /> generation per day. <br /> 3. the plan failed. to show any public rest room facilities as <br /> required by the building code. <br /> 4. the submitted plan fails to comply with required front and <br /> side set-back requirements. <br /> 5. the plan fails to show existing trees and a planting schedule <br /> showing the location, size and caliper of shrubs and trees. <br /> 6. the proposed use exceeds the allowed lot coverage. <br /> 7. the submitted plan of the miniature golf course was not <br /> prepared and signed by a certified engineer or surveyor <br /> as required by the Board of Appeals. <br /> The Board did not find that desirable relief could be granted without <br /> detriment to the public good. <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded the Board of Appeals voted <br /> unanimously on March 28, 1990 to deny the application without prejudice. <br />