1990 JUL-DEC-ZBA APPEALS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

XP l 'hili of C,1itISh�JPP P. O. BOX 11 O B 'ABLE N^ MASHPEE. MA 02649 BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT RE: Petition of Fields Point Limited Parnership for a Special Permit SP-90-01-08 A Petition was filed by Fields Point Limited Partnership of Mashpee, Massachusetts, for a Special Permit under Section 174-25.D.2 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to construct a medical office building in a C-1 zoning district on property located at 51 Nathan Ellis Highway (Map 74, Block 35) Mashpee, Massachusetts. Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee on December 22 and December 29, 1989, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. A public hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on Wednesday, January 10, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at which time the following members of the Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Cheryl A. Hawver, Michael A. Makunas and William J. Hanrahan. Douglas S. Stoors of Fields Point Limited Partnership represented the Petition and reviewed plans for a medical office building which would be built in two phases. The -first phase would be a 15,000 square . foot two-story building with an adjacent 2500 entrance building and the second phase would be a similar 15,000 square foot two-story building on the other side of the entranceway. Plans were revised to provide access for the Fire Department to three sides of the building. The Board of Appeals made the following findings: 1. The proposed use will not cause excessive demand on community facilities. Since this is a commercial project, it will create no increased demand on the Mashpee School System. Highwood .Water Company will provide water to the project and sewage will be treated at the Petitioner's wastewater facility. Demand on other public services, such as fire and police, will be comparable to other commercial developments and not excessive.