12/19/1984 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Home Browse Search

Alun of I. uslipre P. o. BOX 1108 l A HPEE, MA 02649 PLANNING IN BOARD �MTE : 1 ?/19/84 Page Express Mail. to Florida and Mr. Dubin will hold the plan until he receives the covenant . Mr . Jonas signed the plan on behalf of the Bnard and Mr. Devaney paid the balance of $15 which was owed. They will fix the plan as they had the incorrect total number of frontage on Janes Circle . Watersed e - Atty. Kirrane appeared before the Board representing Daniel Hostetter, e said Mr. Hostetter is proposing to develop open space de- velopment subject to Spation 9 of the zoning by-laws and having 3 units/acre . The land is 70.9acres with Zoo ' of frontage necessary to go Forward . They are proposing 135 2-bedroom units . He said they have 54.7 upland acres , 15 .8 acmes of og and 14 wetland acres and would be allowed up to 165 units . They're providing 103 garage spaces . He said he is before the Board for a pre-application' conference to confer with this Board and others to provide input to allow them to procede further because it 's an expense to go further without it . Iie said he 's received ]deports from the Town Planner and from the Barnstable planner but he didn't see Mr . Rowley's report yet . He said he 's prepared to address some of these issues as the pre-application stage is for the Board and other boards to make comments thea try to plan accordingly. They went over Mr. .zdala 's memo and the issue of access constituting a subdivision. Atty,# Kirrane said he spoke to the Town Counsel for the Town of Barnstable and he disagrees with what the Barnstable Planning Board says . Atty. Kirrane said the road already exists and if paving constitutes a subdivision is question to be addressed . For 2001 frontage on a road they will be constructing solely in Mashpee and it will be done according to rules and regulations , nv discussed Mr. Rowley's report . Mv%M . Dubin said the Board was in agreement that it lows like, the units are too close to the bog and thi} pond . Nlr.. Rowley said in to rs of proximity to S ntuit PeNn. d , he was looking at in terms of aesthetics , and the proximity to the bogs created a potential problem with herbicides and pesticides . Atty. Kirrane said the concern- of the elevation in both areas was an issue brought up by the Design Review Committee and they will address it . Also P,ir.. Seaburg, the architect agrees to move the units back from the bank but doesn' t know how far -back. Mr . Fudala read from a report by the Bog Association which suggests a. 150' buffer between bogs and buildings . Att . Kirrane said the developer does own the bogs and does have control over how things are done . Mr. Seaburg said the buildings are now proposed loo' fro? the bog. rJr.. Dubin Felt the 150 ' buffer would be good as it would create more open space . Mr. Snaburg said if they rove buildings back more they would have to move the road and