Laserfiche WebLink
CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br /> ,JUNE 279 1996 <br /> PAGE <br /> The benefit would be less run-off into the wetland area; greater naturl vege- <br /> tation and the elimination of lawn, which would have a significant impact on <br /> the amount of herbicides and pesticides utilized to maintain the lawn. <br /> George Green, ,Jr. : Basically, what you are offering is a trade-off; offering <br /> us the lawn for the deck. <br /> B,iVid Sharpe: I have mown that property and that house since the day it <br /> was built. There never has been a lawn there to mow; there hasn't been <br /> lawn there in the past five years. <br /> Mr. Lelito: Some of it was destroyed three years ago. <br /> David Sharpe: I don't think you have given us a demon thing in exchange for <br /> that deck. <br /> Bob Sherman: First of all, I am pleased that you have informed us of another <br /> element of the violation. I wasn't aware of the excess soil that had been <br /> put there. I was only aware of the incursion of the 50 foot zone that. houldn't <br /> have happened, and was previously denied. My belief is also in the previous permit <br /> and the lengthy discussions that we had on those. we also discussed the reegeta- <br /> tion of that area. So. I don't think this neve etation offer is anything new. <br /> Thi <br />