Laserfiche WebLink
Tara Marden from Woods Hole Group explains that they would like to move the Tee Boxes I & 2 <br /> approximately 13' & 17' (respectively) back away from the coastal bank due to severe beach <br /> erosion. They have been placing 15-30,000 yards of beach nourishment each year to protect the <br /> coastal bank. The cart path is already impacted by the erosion. They will need to place some fill <br /> where the Tee boxes are being relocated. There is a man-made water body that has taken on <br /> some fresh water wetland characteristics so they are prepared to include mitigation because of that <br /> buffer zone. The sod will be removed from the original locations and placed at the new proposed <br /> locations. The areas will be re-planted. The cart path will also be relocated and they plan on <br /> leaving the existing path as is because it is a shelled path. Because they are close to a wetland <br /> area, they have agreed to use a low or no phosphorous nitrate for fertilizing. Agent McManus <br /> states that new mitigation will have to be monitored because of storm damage in that area. The <br /> Agent would like to see the plant plan and methodology. He also requests the type of fertilizer that <br /> is intended to be used. Mr. Sweet asks why they can not install some kind of device like a jetty or <br /> revetment as some course of action to prevent or slow down the erosion. The Agent explains that <br /> by placing that type of wall, it takes away the sediment source for coastal beaches and it also takes <br /> a lot of money to maintain. The Chairman asks if they will need to put in nourishment every year <br /> and Ms. Marden confirms that they will still have to do some nourishment but she's hoping it will be <br /> reduced. <br /> Steve Dunn who is an abutter to the golf course asks if there will be any fences being installed and <br /> Ms. Marden states that there will be no fences. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to Close and Issue pending receipt of a <br /> narrative for fertilizer usage and a detailed landscape plan <br /> 7:24 Dennis & Rosearm Williams (Triton Sound Circle Reserved Area Easement) Create Staging <br /> Area for Revetment Repair— RDA <br /> Resource Area: Buffer Zone to Coastai Bank <br /> Material submitted.- To License Repair& Maintain an Existing Revetment Add a ToeStOne Apron <br /> & Replicate a Coastal Beach — Staging Area 1/17111 BSC Group <br /> Norman Hayes from BSC Group explains that they will be using a Right-of-Way easement that was <br /> authorized by New Seabury to build a staging area at the top of the coastal bank for the repair of a <br /> revetment that has state and local permits. The equipment will come down the beach one time and <br /> will be stored on the Maushop Beach and then be gone. Agent McManus asks if the first house is <br /> encroaching the easement and Mr. Hayes is not sure but they have agreed that if they need to <br /> move some of the red cedars, they will make sure that they survive. The Agent also asks about the <br /> pines and Mr. Hayes says they will not be touched. They will be removing the fence and then re- <br /> installed. The invasives will be removed and when finished be replaced with bayberries. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination <br /> 7:27 ConCom Fees Increase <br /> Agent McManus explains that the Regulation Subcommittee had performed a comparison reporting <br /> of the surrounding towns' fees and the new fees being proposed is a result of that comparison. The <br /> "After-The-Fact"fees were rather random amounts and now will be doubled which the Agent <br /> believes will be a better impact. RDA's, Administrative Reviews and Extensions will be increased. <br /> COC's will add a 3rd inspection fee. The Continuance fee will remain the same. There is no public <br /> comment. The next step is to present it back to the Board of Selectmen's. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously to approve the new proposed fee schedule <br /> 5 <br />