Laserfiche WebLink
Additional comments from the Committee included the following: <br /> Basically you have a retail space for selling product with no roof. <br /> Biggest problem is being in the buffer area. There is a zoning buffer requirement. <br /> This whole development was approved with certain conditions and extensive landscaping gent <br /> with that approval. <br /> In violation of your own special Permit. Walter said you got your Special Permit; you built your <br /> building; but did a lot of things not approved or in your Special Permit. <br /> Torn Fudala noted it would be a use variance. <br /> Applicant would have to go through Design Review/Plan Review and ZBA. Will need engineer <br /> site plan for the reviews. Before submitting application you would have to be in compliance <br /> with special Permit item originally approved. <br /> Rich Concordi said he believes they did get Permit for a small area furniture display outside. <br /> Committee asked him to bring his paperwork to show who issued the Permit. <br /> Ken Foster said this is the reason they're here; they need to know the road they have to travel <br /> because they're looking at it long-tern. <br /> Ken Foster asked whether or not traffic lights are going to be placed there sometime in the future so <br /> that would be a 4-way intersection. Toni l=udala responded that if it ever happens it is a long time <br /> away...has to cone up with money to do it. <br /> Walter Yarosh noted applicant has the right to go through the permitting process. Toni F ud a la said <br /> he is not sire they have the right—By-Law does not allow display of product outside, Torry said <br /> because of the use variance they can't get it unless By-Law is amended. <br /> Michael.Petit, Ken Foster and lick ConcordieAted the meeting. <br /> Agprova f Minutes <br /> -.www <br /> Design Review <br /> Walter Yarosh approved the minutes of the Design Review meeting of March 20, 1 2012. <br /> Plan Review <br /> Glen Darrington motioned to accept the Flan Review minutes of April � 2012 as amended; Joel <br /> Clifford seconded the motion; and it was unanimously approved <br /> Discussion <br /> There was a brief discussion as to having more time to review materials and, perhaps, being able to <br /> inform applicants as to what is needed before they come to the meeting. However, it was noted that <br /> V <br /> n some instances applicants dont submit materials because they are coming, as done today, for <br /> preliminary review and guidance to see ghat they need to do. <br /> 2 <br />