Laserfiche WebLink
# y <br /> MINUTES J ly 25, 1996 5 BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> Mr. McQuaid stated, "we are already over our 45 day lima on either approving or <br /> disapproving the proposed plan." "This care before us first May 30, 1996 which would <br /> have brought us to July 15, 1996.71 <br /> Mr. Doherty informed l rlr. Lupo, "By your not providing that plan before tonight <br /> and the Board faing to approve or disapprove it the law allows the applicant to assume <br /> that it is approved and go forrard.13� <br /> Mr. Snick stated, "I am willing to allow one more week for Mr. Lupo to provide a <br /> plan from his engineer." <br /> Mr. McQuaid comiented, "The Board has adopted more stringent regulations <br /> than Title V g from 100' well to septic to 15 o' well to septic.11) `"our intention there <br /> all along was newly created subdivisions to ensure that the lot size would be sufficient <br /> to create that distance." "our intention was never to, in a pre-approved subdivision, <br /> create an unbuildabl lot." "As long as the lot in the pre-approved subdivision met State <br /> requirements it was granted a variance." "our intention is to look towards the future not <br /> to withhold someone's ability to build on a lot haat they have owned for who knows how <br /> long and apply the more stringent regulations to that property owner." <br /> Mr. Lupo stated, "This is a sensitive area." "The Board is still operating on 1' or <br /> ' of questionable measurements.131 <br /> Mr. Doherty motioned to continue this matter for one week, 1 r. Ball seconded, All <br /> agreed. <br /> A I TTNIE T: Cape & Islands - 38 Coombs Lame <br /> Mr. McQuaid stated, "Plans were submitted in 1987. "The original pert expired <br /> t which time the owner requested a 6 month extension which was granted by the hoard." <br /> "'The applicant is requesting the pert and plans remain valid." `'In any opinion, plans <br /> should comply with the new Title v requirements.", "There is absolutely no reason, in my <br /> opinion, the Board should issue a permit based on a 1987 plan even though we extended <br /> the perc up until last }rear.' <br /> Mr. Sanicki stated, "If the plan and this design was filed prior to Mqrch o, of <br /> 1995 and was on record with the Board then I believe it could be installed.' `The owner <br /> doe's not want to go through the expense o redesigning it. "She is requesting approval <br /> to install the system at this time." "I think the new Title v rogue it as beim the playa <br /> of record with the Board and is allowed to be installed.' <br /> L - - <br />