Laserfiche WebLink
Ther are welcome. to bring it tip with town ousel auai n . <br /> Mr . Brooks said it becomes an expense issue for them if they cannot use <br /> him. They will have to bring in people from New Jersey. <br /> Joel asked if their proposal will be modified pending a. resolution of this <br /> issue? <br /> Mr . Brooks said it will not , they have a $10 , 000 cap for expenses . <br /> - They have a carr icui.LIm conSLIltant } Ralph Grub , but was confused as to <br /> what he would do until Mr . Brooks spoke with Dr . DeMoura and now has a more <br /> realistic handle on it , According to Dr . DeMoura, the curriculum <br /> consultant will give general direction for courses , guidelines for training <br /> teachers <br /> Paul said the committee agrees , it is not to develop carr icul am but <br /> identify software in each part of the curriculum. The Superintendent and <br /> rinc ipa l will need advice ) an overview, <br /> Mr. Brooks asked if the Committee had contacted. Digital yet? They have an <br /> educational systems program, it is a. good place to get information and get <br /> a head start , <br /> Mr . Brooks said there is a. gap ; between the report and what was generated. <br /> on the drawings ► It is not clear to Haim where that information carne from, <br /> there is nothing in writing on how that determination was made <br /> Merry Sue explained there was a series of meet.ing s , between CCR, Mannv <br /> Tavares ( furn].ture consultant ) , Childs and the architects * <br /> He said there are some things in the report he has a problem with <br /> - 81MM video is a dead format and he expects the manufacturers to p€al1 the <br /> plug on it . <br /> - you cannot depend on CD Rom for video . <br /> he doesn't recommend investment in 16 mm film. <br /> -- he does not recommend investment in overhead projectors . <br /> He is concerned about the budget nrimbers . $80 , 000 for a Tv studio seems <br /> thin but he does not have all the details - line items , <br /> Paul explained this Committee has nothing set in stone , e Lcept the <br /> infrastructure . The committee wants this consultant to make decisions in <br /> conjunction with the Superintendent and Pr inc.ipa,l <br /> Joel said. the RFP asked this consultant to review and update that plan. <br /> Mr. Brooks discussed his proposed schedule .. <br /> about 60 days to prepare the technical report , with equipment budget and <br /> contingency plan.. He will allow about 30 days to review that , make changes <br /> and re-issue it ( 90 total days until report approved) . He thea proposes an <br /> additional 60 days to prepare the bid drawings and specs , and another <br /> weeks for review by all parties . A 3 week bid process � th.en award of the <br /> bid . contractor has 60 days from receipt of approval and another 60 days on <br /> site , which may each other . Another 15 days for system checks . A <br /> total of 342 days but some may be folded into each other* <br /> He included extensive l.anc Uag e about substitution and changes in his <br /> documents . He includes a. clause that the owner has the right to use the <br /> equipment andcan. use it without acceptance . After acceptance the warranty <br /> 7 <br />