My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/5/2018 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
9/5/2018 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2018 5:00:39 PM
Creation date
10/5/2018 2:09:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/05/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stock. Mr. O'Neil suggested that more people were staying longer than the summer season to use their <br /> properties. Mr. O'Neil discussed the development of Mashpee's new library, suggesting that the idea <br /> of building new and bigger was bad, was misinformation. <br /> Mr. Fudala stated his opinion that the Article was a good one, adding that the ZBA had been violating <br /> the law at every meeting due to requests for lot size and frontage requirements, which made it <br /> necessary to have the new Bylaw in place. The Chair asked for final comments from Board members. <br /> Mr. Weeden expressed his concern regarding the protection of historic property. Mr. Weeden <br /> indicated that there were a few structures that remained as personal properties. Mr. Bonvie responded <br /> that research was typically conducted prior to being considered at the ZBA, should a property fall <br /> within an archeologically significant area. Mr. Mendoza responded that there were currently no <br /> requirements in town regarding historically registered homes but structures located within the Historic <br /> District were first reviewed by the Historic District Commission. Mr. Weeden responded that <br /> Mashpee had a town-wide sensitivity assessment with recommendations by PAL for eligible <br /> structures, but not on the Register, but Mr. Mendoza responded that it had no legal bearing. <br /> Mr. Balzarini highly recommended the Article. It was noted that there would be a public hearing on <br /> the issue. <br /> Warrant Article 17: Mobile Food Truck-Mr. Mendoza explained that, one year ago, a <br /> mobile food truck operator expressed interest in setting up at a particular location. The issue was not <br /> currently addressed in the Bylaws. Mr. Mendoza confirmed that the Board of Health would still <br /> address the food aspect of the operation. There were no comments from members of the Board, the <br /> staff or the public. <br /> Mr. Fudala stated that a food truck was a vehicle and, as such, could not be regulated under the Zoning <br /> Bylaw and suggested that the Article be withdrawn. Mr. Fudala indicated that a Food Truck Court <br /> could be created as a use, but otherwise zoning could not regulate the location of a food truck. Mr. <br /> Mendoza responded that the table in the Article dealt with food truck use. Mr. Lehrer suggested that <br /> food trucks would follow the traffic, relocating as needed to reach the most customers and inquired <br /> what currently precluded them from setting up in a location. Mr. Mendoza referenced the example of <br /> the truck being parked at Botelho's which did not list food truck as a use at that location. Mr. Lehrer <br /> inquired whether a license could be obtained from the Board of Selectmen but Mr. Mendoza responded <br /> that they did not wish to go that route as concern was expressed from the DPW and Police Department, <br /> as well as concerns expressed by the Board of Health. <br /> Chairman Waygan stated that it was unlikely that the Planning Board would ask the Selectmen to <br /> withdraw the Article. Mr. Lehrer further inquired whether food trucks were licensed and Mr. Mendoza <br /> inquired what would give him the right to grant the use on the table. The Chair stated that the Planning <br /> Board did not object to the Article, wanting only for it to be a legal mechanism, suggesting that Town <br /> Counsel review the Article. <br /> Warrant Article 18: Continuance,Extension or Alteration-It was Mr. Fudala's opinion that <br /> Article 18 should be withdrawn because it would eliminate grandfathering and increase variances. Mr. <br /> Fudala stated that the current Bylaws allowed that the rules applied to a home were the rules that were <br /> applied when it was built. Mr. Mendoza agreed, stating that the only addition was the second sentence <br /> and provided an example of a request to add a deck to the back of a home not meeting the setbacks, but <br /> the deck would meet setbacks, --,hich:.could need to be sent to the ZBA for consideration. Mr. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.