Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ■ <br /> previously. Mr. Hall stated that he.did not wish to make the scope modifications and shi#fing of <br /> funds without feedback from the Commission. Chairman Fudala clarified that the items <br /> previously located under 6 would be moved to 8 and item 7, the engineering and preliminary <br /> design of the F-1 pipeline, would be completely removed since it was unnecessary at the present <br /> time. The Chair stated that the contract was originally negotiated in 1999 and that a shift in the <br /> budget was necessary since limited funds were available and that a request for an increase of <br /> about $1 ,000 had been made. <br /> Mr. Lyons made a motion to approve the shifting of funds from the earlier stern <br /> designations to the later designations as long as the work is completed as required, Mr. <br /> Gurnee seconded the motion. <br /> Mr. Klenert inquired about the total value of the items and Mr. Lyons estimated it to be $36,000 <br /> shifting from 6 and 7 to 8. Chairman Fudala stated that the amendment to the contract would <br /> need to be signed by the Town Manager, adding that the vote would be a recommendation to the <br /> Town Mwiager. Mr. Malarkey inquired about what authority the Commission had to make <br /> decisions based on an article he read in the Enterprise. Commissioners responded that the vote <br /> would be a recommendation. Chairman Fudala stated that, although the original contract had <br /> been signed by the Sever Commission, the Town Manager was now responsible for signing <br /> contracts clue to the Charter. The Chair indicated that a contract amendment would be developed <br /> with Mr. Gobell's assistance and approved by Town Counsel, the Town Accountant and the <br /> Town Manager. Mr. Gurnee recommended that a rationalization for the change be included with <br /> the recommendation. Mr. Klenert expressed 'interest in seeing the document_ The Chair stated <br /> that he could present it to Town Counsel on February 27. <br /> yes, 1 abstain <br /> Invoices <br /> -GHD Invoices for$3,315!$500/$1,180-Chairman Fudala referenced the invoices received from <br /> GHD and the monthly progress report highlighting the work completed. There was discussion <br /> regarding the budget spread sheets. The Chair stated that $101,902 had been spent in the current <br /> loan and that $68,383 was remaining. Explanations regarding the work completed were <br /> available in the monthly progress reports. fir. Gregg noted that the $3,315 invoice was for the <br /> eoHyd rocycl a groundwater modeling analysis for Site 4,the transfer station, only and GH 's <br /> development of the report, <br /> 1r. Klenert inquired whether the tests would expire after 5 years and Mr. Gregg stated that it <br /> was data developed in order to evaluate and validate the site. lir. Gregg added that, as part o <br /> the permitting process,the site would again be required to conduct a perc test. Mr. Klenert <br /> inquired about the 'infiltration rate and Mr. Gregg responded that it was approximately 70 gallons <br /> per day per square foot. Mr. Gregg also discussed the means by which a town would negotiate <br /> with the State to adjust the rate to reach an agreed upon loading rate. <br /> Mr. Lyons made a motion to pay the$4,995 comprised of three invoices of$1,180, $500 and <br /> $3,315 as presented. Mr. Gurnee seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> 3 <br />