My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-Annual Town Report
>
1992-Annual Town Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2019 10:09:27 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:03:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Annual_Town_Report
DocType
Annual Town Report
Year
1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
good water thus raising septic problems and <br /> Report of the environmental issues. "DEM"and the"Town"agreed t <br /> g a <br /> South Cape B State defer the aforementioned development of the uplands at <br /> this time and inserting such change in the "Notice of <br /> Park AdvisoryCommittee ,} . . <br /> Project Change thus eliminating these issues. ' <br /> g it is <br /> however, understood that the construction of a visitors <br /> center and sanitary facilities at the New Town Beach are <br /> To the Honorable Board of Selectmen to be addressed in a supplemental report prepared later <br /> and the Citizens of the Town of Mashpee: and then constructed. <br /> The South Cape Beach State Park Advisory This"Notice of Project Change"was published in the <br /> Committee ("Committee") at its monthly meetings Environmental Monitor on April 7, 1992 and later <br /> during the year 1992 considered and made various approved by Janet McCabe, Assistant Secretar , <br /> Y) <br /> recommendations relative to the use of the South Cape Environmental Impact Review, thereby authorizing <br /> Beach State Park("Park')which will be discussed later in "`DEM' to proceed with improvement of Creat Oak <br /> this report. Road and fund its improvements so long as there is not <br /> relocation of the `Road."'. <br /> GREAT OAK ROAD <br /> Although it appears that the "Town" could now <br /> As stated in my 1991 Annual Report,the Department proceed to improve Great Oak Road there were several <br /> of Environmental Management ("DEM') is obligated concerns which Greg Taylor, the Director of Public <br /> pursuant to its Agreement of December 27,1990 with the Works, presented to the"Committee."He cited an area <br /> Town to provide to the Town $620,000 of which up to where Great Oak Road has a fairly sharp curve thereby <br /> $580,000 is to be used by the Town to improve Great Oak posing a potential public safety concern to pedestrians <br /> Road and$40,000 is for reimbursement to the Town for and cyclists; he further referred to four otherP articular <br /> monies already expended in correcting a major areas where he felt it would be preferable to move slightly <br /> encroachment of Great Oak Road on land known as the outside of the road as travelled and thus avoid the need of <br /> Kennedy property, any eminent domain proceedings or monetary <br /> settlements with private property owners. He also <br /> There were several prerequisites that had to be met asserted the desire of the Board of Selectmen to construct <br /> before these monies would be available to the"Town":(i) at this time a bicycle path on Great Oak Road,aP osition <br /> appropriate language inserted in fiscal 1993 budget and which the "Committee"has at all times fully supported <br /> orted <br /> approval by the Legislature; (ii) compliance with the and encouraged provided there are sufficient monies for <br /> MEPA requirements and process and the filing of the thisu ose which appears ' <br /> P rP ppe s unlikely. <br /> appropriate certificate. With reference to (i), <br /> Representative Thomas Cahir and Senator Henri Nick vontzalides, "DEM" counsel and the <br /> auschenbach were successful in having inserted in the "Committee"expressed concern that any deviation from <br /> fiscal 1993 budget the appropriate language authorizing the 1990 Great Oak Road Construction Agreement could <br /> the transfer of subject monies which was thereafter potentially cost substantial monies in excess of that <br /> approved by both Houses of the Legislature thus making currently authorized and might also affect MEPA's <br /> the funds available to the "Town"when needed. approval and or require further filings thusfurther <br /> delaying the improvement of the "Road." <br /> With reference to(ii),there were several problems that <br /> had to be resolved in order to attain full compliance with A meeting was first held with MEPA on July 20, 1992 <br /> the MEPA process, namely, (a) due to thea apparent to discuss uss these issues. An on-site inspection was held to <br /> MIS <br /> reading of the Great Oak Road Construction determine <br /> what impact, 1f any, the proposed <br /> Agreement it was erroneously misconstrued that the modifications would have relati real.At <br /> ve to wetlands a <br /> "Road" was to be reconstructed with a completed MEPA's request,q est, Mr. Taylor is to prepare or have <br /> realignment of its right of way so as to conform to the prepared plans showing the the <br /> P g proposed changes from <br /> paper right of way on record at the Barnstable Land originallans for review the <br /> P w by MEPA and <br /> Court thus posing various environmental problems.That "Committee." <br /> in fact was not the case. The "Agreement" required an <br /> improvement of the "Road"consistent with the riht of NEW EW TG WN BEACH <br /> way as presently used and travelled. Accordingly a <br /> "Notice of Project Change"had to be filed and processed The funds recess a. <br /> ary to construct the New Town Beach, <br /> on order to correct the erroneous interpretation McGregor Road and e s <br /> g parking area were authorized sorn <br /> aforestated.(b)Additionally,the original Environmental time agohave but ha not been released due to the serious <br /> Report included the construction in the New Town Beach economic plight r <br /> of a visitors center,its lavatories facilities P g of the Commonwealth and the need fo <br /> ties and supplying funds for other projects of greater priority to "DEM." <br /> r <br /> �no <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.