My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
10/16/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 2:12:43 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 2:12:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/16/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e <br /> .� Zolull of C MSljpce <br /> P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> P,qg Fj MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OCTOBER 16, 1985 PAGE 8 <br /> Other: Edward Grogan <br /> Meetinghouse Road/Hollow Road'Goodspeed' s Meeting House Road/Noisy <br /> Hole Road <br /> Discussion of Meeting House Village condominium project <br /> For the purpose of this hearing, Mr. Jonas abstained. Mr. Kevin Kirrane stated <br /> that several weeks ago, there was some discussion on what an acceptable number <br /> of units would be for the project, considering the impact the project would have <br /> on the surrounding neighborhood and also the affect of the pending lawsuit. At <br /> that time, there was a suggestion that there be in the vicinity of 135 units. <br /> There are now 24 buildings, each having 6 units, for a total of 144 units. Mr. <br /> Dubin would like to see more of a buffer on Meeting House Road and feels that <br /> 138 units (one less building) would be good. Mr. Kirrane stated that because <br /> of the extraordinary expense of the sewerage treatment plant, Mr. Grogan would <br /> Iike 144 units. Ms. Stone stated that she felt 138 units was good, but she is <br /> also concerned with the buffer. Mr. Collins would like to see 144 units. Mr. <br /> Ferragamo felt that 144 units was good, but would like to see some work done on <br /> the location of the 6 units bordering Meeting House Road. Mr. Collins moved to <br /> allow 144 units, subject to relocation of the 6 units so that there would be less <br /> of an impact on Meeting House Road and the abutters. Mr. Ferragamo seconded the <br /> motion and the Board voted unanimously in favor. Mr. Dubin stated that when a <br /> new plan is done, it would be put on the agenda. Mr. Kirrane stated that he would <br /> draft a letter of extention. <br /> Mr. Kirrane stated that he has another client that talked to someone about being <br /> on the agenda, but was not put on. He asked if he could be heard now. Mr. Dubin <br /> stated that Paderborn has also requested time on the agenda for a review of their <br /> Preliminary Plan. It was decided that it would be heard after Mr. Barrett. <br /> Mr. Kirrane stated that Mr. Barrett has constructed a house on what he thought was <br /> his land, but the dwelling has been completed across his lot line. Mr. Kirrane <br /> requested a redefinition of the lot line so that he could meet the necessary side <br /> lines. There was a discussion on whether a variance would be reauired from the <br /> Board of Appeals. It was decided that because the change would not effect the <br /> frontage, it was alright. Mr. Collins moved to accept it. Mr. Jonas seconded <br /> the motion and the Board voted unanimously in favor. The plan was signed. Mr. <br /> Dubin pointed out that the wrong zoning district was listed. Mr. Kirrane said <br /> that it would be changed. <br /> Paderborn Development Company: <br /> The last time they were before the Board, the maximum allowable lots was 110. <br /> Because they straightened the road, there is now 112 maximum allowable lots. <br /> They have only 99 lots. The plan is going to the Board of Appeals and they are <br /> looking for informal approval from the Planning Board. Mr. Fudala suggested that <br /> they show lot size. It will be done. They provided certificates of ownership. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.