Laserfiche WebLink
P. O. Box 1108 <br /> MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES : 5/l/85 P. 2 <br /> Mr. Dubin opened the public hearing on amending Section 6.3 of the <br /> Zoning By-Laws . He read the notice as advertised in the newspaper (see <br /> attached) . <br /> Mr. Dubin: This one is from Conservation. Any proponent here on this <br /> one? Conservation Commission, Board of Appeals? <br /> Mr. Marsters : This is same article that was almost unanimously voted <br /> down at the last meeting. My feeling again is it 's totally unnecessary. <br /> It 's more red tape , under 451 and everyone who has a dock now would have <br /> to go out and get a special permit . It would be a horrendous problem. <br /> Mr. Dubin: Well the main- reason we objected before was because . . . <br /> Mr. Marsters : Any dock proposed has to be approved by Conservation and <br /> Harbormaster, Corps of Engineers waterways division. <br /> Mr. Warwick: The docks usually aren't built out into a body of water <br /> beyond where it 's necessary. There 's not much use in having a 45, dock <br /> if just 611 of water. It 's not practical. So you go another 101 and <br /> you have 3 ' of water. Which may be suitable for the boat that 's going <br /> to be tied up. I don't think in Mashpee in particular anyone has gone <br /> beyond their limits just to have a dock 150' long. I mean that 's not <br /> the reason for it . I think the reason for it is to accomodate a boat . <br /> If the boat requires 3 ' of water then the dock has to be extended to <br /> where they have 3 ' of water. I just want to add that as a comment . I <br /> think a by-law restricting a dock to 45 ' would be redundant . <br /> Mr. Dubin: This doesn't really do that . The existing by-law makes it <br /> necessary to get the special permit if the dock's more than 45 ' long. <br /> The proponents of this article apparently want the situation to be that <br /> you have to get a special permit if it 's 101 long, any dock. OK. Any <br /> other comments on this one? (there were none ) . Well the Board will <br /> take this article under advisement . <br /> Mr. Dubin oepned the public hearing on amending Section 7 of the Zoning <br /> By-Laws . He read the notice as advertised in the newspaper (see <br /> attached) . <br /> Mr. Fudala: Before you go on I would like to state that I 've amended <br /> this article . I have copies of it . What the amended will do is <br /> eliminate all reference to commercial districts . <br /> Mr. Dubin: We did this at the last meeting didn't we? <br /> Mr. Fudala: Yes . This is a situation of a double public hearing. So in <br />