My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/1/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
5/1/1985 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 2:34:48 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 2:34:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/01/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P. O. Box 1 108 <br /> MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES : 5/l/85 P. 4 <br /> reviews on projects and the Committee is only advisory and there 's no <br /> way of maintaining, no way of guaranteeing maintenance and it had <br /> nothing to do with any particular landscaping project , but just trying <br /> to keep uniform landscaping on Rte . 28 . <br /> Mr. Marsters : I guess you're saying the Design Review hasn't done <br /> their job. I think you questioned them on the ones you thought they <br /> hadn't done their job on and found they weren't involved in them at <br /> all. Design Review has done their job in every single case . <br /> Mr. Fudala: I still think Madaket Place which they did review is not <br /> proper even under the current wording. <br /> Mr. Marsters : That 's a matter of judgement . <br /> Mr. Dubin: Any other comments from the public on this proposed article? <br /> (there were none ) . The Board will take this article under advisement . <br /> Mr. Dubin opened the public hearing on amending Section 4 of the Zoning <br /> By-Laws . He read the notice as advertised in the newspaper (see <br /> attached) . <br /> Mr. Dubin: This your article , Tom? <br /> Mr. Fudala: It was submitted by the Historical Commission and by petition. <br /> Mr. Dubin: Anybody here from Historical Commission on this article care <br /> to offer any comments? <br /> Anna Tanneyhill: The Historical Commission is charged with preserving <br /> the historic ways , sites and buildings and with the rapid growth of the <br /> town and developments moving in and new buildings , there is fear that <br /> some of the old roads may be abandoned or built on or something would <br /> be done so that access to water or to wherever road is leading would <br /> be lost and that is :our concern. Not only building sites but roads should <br /> be preserved. Briefly that 's our position. <br /> Mr. Dubin: It looks like probably the most innovative part of this is <br /> that there 's going to be another hearing. Now as things stand now the <br /> Planning Board typically would not allow the abandonment of an ancient <br /> way. Any road shown that we know about I think we protect . However if <br /> I understand the article this would require a separate hearing. We 've <br /> had a few cases where people came in and seek to relocate dirt roads or <br /> ancient ways as it stands now, it doesn't require a hearing before the <br /> Selectmen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.