3/4/2020 PLANNING BOARD Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

construction. Mr. Crispin stated that the site would be entirely sewered with a pump station, and all utilities would be underground. Regarding the water system, Mr. Falacci indicated that the flow would be circular and not dead end. Mr. Falacci was in agreement with Mr. Rowley regarding erosion control and would be providing detailed plans to address the issue. Mr. Falacci wished to install a berm prior to cutting the trees, working with Mr. Rowley to address the issue. Mr. Falacci described strategies learned in Phase III, using temporary recharge barriers to prevent water from leaving the property. Mr. Falacci emphasized their goal to ensure that runoff issues were better than before,using gutter systems, dry wells,road catch basins and soils and plantings. Mr. Balzarini inquired about the location of entrances and fencing and Mr. Falacci pointed out the locations and discussed plans for improved landscaping. Mr. Falacci stated that the sales cottage and design center entry would remain, until sellout. Mr. Balzarini inquired about a new road at Phase III and Mr. Falacci responded that he had been in contact with the Fire Department about possibly adding a gate to eliminate illegal dumping. Mr. Cummings,referencing comments received from residents, inquired whether there would be a reduction in water supply and Mr. Falacci responded that it would improve due to circulation and the water Department had no issues with the project. The Chair inquired whether Mr. Falacci had been in receipt of the comments, but he had not, so the Chair read a letter from Mr. Batarian. Regarding traffic, Mr. Falacci responded that there would be some increase in traffic, but that the gate would alleviate some traffic and confirmed that the traffic had already been permitted. The Chair also read a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Rad expressing concern about traffic congestion, older building and visibility at the main entrance. Mr. Falacci responded that traffic was always a concern, but once the sales cottage was not needed,that entrance would be eliminated, alleviating the extra traffic at the entrance. Mr. Crispin added that the driveways to the new units would lead into the center and not onto the main roads. Regarding landscaping, Mr. Falacci confirmed that the entrances would be well landscaped and typical to New Seabury. Mr. Phelan stated that he had walked the property and found that most was flat, except at the southwest corner. Mr. Phelan inquired about a pipe at lot 25 and Mr. Falacci responded that, as part of the Agreement to Judgement,New Seabury was required to maintain monitoring wells. Mr. Phelan inquired about a street name and Mr. Falacci confirmed that the cul-de-sac would be named Azalea Lane. Mr. Phelan inquired about a well-traveled ancient way and Mr. Falacci confirmed that it would be maintained or shifted in areas. Mr. Lehrer confirmed that he had nothing further to add. Mr. Rowley confirmed that there had been two meetings regarding the project, where Mr. Rowley was able to mark up a plan for further discussion,which was helpful in providing a two way discussion, allowing matters to be addressed immediately. Mr. Rowley expressed concern about steep areas and the necessity for proper control to limit erosion and runoff. A berm around the road for containment, prior to cutting down trees,may help to address erosion issues or potential problems. It was Mr. Rowley's opinion that all other issues had been addressed. The Chair inquired whether the project proponent would accept a condition with the decision that Mr. Rowley work collaboratively on a construction and erosion control plan and Mr. Falacci agreed. Mr. Falacci described work they had completed at Phase III to mitigate similar issues. Mr. Falacci noted that retaining walls would be necessary in the area, along with plantings and grass. 4