Laserfiche WebLink
Case 1:19-cv-12333 Document 1 Filed 11/13/19 .Page 5 of 21 <br /> 30. As determined by the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA")'Report, the proposed <br /> personal wireless service facility at this location should not adversely impact designated wilderness <br /> areas, designated wildlife preserves,threatened or endangered species or critical habitats,historic <br /> places,Indian religious sites,floodplain,wetlands,or aviation standards. <br /> 31. To ensure compliance with the local, regional and state standards for sound, Blue Sky retained <br /> Modeling Specialties to conduct a Sound Impact Assessment Study.at the Proposed Site. <br /> 32. In its report, Modeling Specialties confirmed that at full-build out of the Proposed Site, the <br /> conservative estimates of sound remain in compliance with all relevant regulations for sound. <br /> 33. The Commission confirmed Modeling Specialties findings. <br /> 34. To determine compliance with all relevant radio frequency emissions standards,Blue Sky retained <br /> Dr. Donald Haes to prepare a cumulative radio frequency exposure report for the Proposed Site. <br /> 35. Dr. Haes' concluded that the proposed personal wireless service facility, including the antennas <br /> and equipment of Verizon Wireless,T-Mobile,and the Town's EMS equipment,will comply with <br /> all regulatory guidelines for radio frequency exposure, including relevant sections of the <br /> Massachusetts Department of Public Health regulations and the FCC's guidelines for RF exposure. <br /> 36. The Commission confirmed Dr.Haes findings. <br /> 37. The Board did not retain an expert in the field of radio frequency. <br /> 38. To ensure that the Proposed Site would not adversely affect property values,Blue Sky retained the <br /> services of FairMarket Advisors, LLC and Mark Correnti, Massachusetts Certified Residential <br /> Appraiser. <br /> 39. FairMarket Advisors,LLC's report and supplemental report concludes that the Proposed Site will <br /> not adversely affect property values. <br /> 40. The Commission concluded that the Proposed Site would not adversely affect property values. <br /> 41. The Board did not retain an expert or engage the services of an appraiser. <br /> 5 <br />