Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Callahan felt that he did not want to make decisions without all Board members being <br /> present. Mr. Lehrer said that he really wanted to get the endorsement of the Board regarding the <br /> timeline set forth on the Gantt Chart wanting to be sure that the timelines are appropriate and it is <br /> laid out in a manner that makes sense. He said he laid out the initial part of the timeline similar <br /> to Yarmouth but then customized the plan to what he thought was appropriate for the Mashpee <br /> Planning Board. He elaborated that the chart is just a guidance tool to hold ourselves <br /> accountable during the process to achieve our goals within a certain amount of time so that we <br /> can move on to Phase II. Mr. Lehrer asked the Board to scrutinize the chart and to send him any <br /> comments in writing so that the information can be updated and finalized at the next meeting. <br /> For the other document he wanted to be sure to add comments redlined by Ms. Waygan. At <br /> future meetings, he would like the Board to agree on the framework and timelines. Mr. Lehrer <br /> said the way that he laid out the timeline is so that the project will be complete by the time of <br /> Town Meeting in Spring 2022. Ms. Waygan inquired as to whether Mr. Lehrer had to submit <br /> this as a warrant to the Selectmen a few months in advance of the Town Meeting. Mr. Lehrer <br /> stated that this would be the second Monday in February of 2022. Mr. Lehrer said that he may be <br /> incorrect but he could anticipate seeking Town Meeting approval of the Vision Statement. The <br /> Vision Statement would be included as Chapter 1 of the LCP update and Town Meeting would <br /> have to adopt the update but he doesn't believe that they would have to go to Town Meeting with <br /> a warrant article in Spring of 2022 but he will inquire of the Commission. He stated that <br /> ultimately the Planning Board,the Selectmen and Town Meeting would need to adopt the <br /> complete updated plan which would include the Vision Statement. Mr Balzarini then questioned <br /> whether the Cape Cod Commission would have to adopt this as well. Mr. Lehrer responded <br /> affirmative that the Commission would need to certify that it is compliant with the Regional <br /> Policy Plan. Ms. Waygan then questioned Mr. Lehrer as to whether he wanted to inform the <br /> Board that comments are due within a week so that the Vision Plan and the Gant Chart could be <br /> finalized at the next meeting. Mr. Lehrer agreed and said comments are due by February l0th <br /> This would allow time for any changes to be made so that the documents would be ready for the <br /> next meeting on the 17th of February. Mr. Callahan asked Mr. Lehrer to email tomorrow and <br /> once again on Monday the 151h as a reminder to the Board to submit comments. <br /> The Board recessed until 7:00 PM <br /> The Board reconvened at 7:00 PM. <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> In reference to the meeting minutes of January 20, 2021,there was consensus among Board <br /> members to defer approval of these minutes until the Board has more time to review their <br /> contents until the next Planning Board meeting on February 17, 2021. <br /> MOTION: In reference to the January 6,2021 meeting minutes, Mary Waygan made a <br /> motion to accept the minutes as presented. Mr Balzarini seconded the motion. The motion <br /> passed unanimously <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> Review of Consulting Engineer candidates and set interview dates/times <br /> 3 <br />