Laserfiche WebLink
S T 1 <br /> �rJdJUA�.a Town of�Vl as, ■ e e Aannin Board <br /> L�VV V 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Phelan slightly disagrees as both go hand in hand. Zoning plays a role in how you plan. You must <br /> look at both at the same time. Proposed zoning changes will impact how the plan is going to look. On <br /> the 2111, the Cape Cod Commission will give us some clarity on the process. We will all have input and <br /> a better understanding. He does not expect to be handed blueprints. If zoning does not apply, then <br /> those plans will be moot. Some of that is predicated by zoning changes. We will get more in the next <br /> few days. The vote to support the changes will not go to the Town if it does not work. Next five weeks <br /> we will learn a lot. If we just pause and go through these meetings and do not have a preconceived <br /> notion until we see it. <br /> Mr. Cotton clarified that Affordable Housing requirements are set forth by the State. We just dealt with <br /> this with wastewater. The brakes were put on for a whole year and then it unanimously passed at Town <br /> Meeting. Whatever it takes to get all the right answers is what you are here for. When you guys are <br /> ready to present in a way to be approved by the Town, you will. <br /> Ms. Waygan hopes what she says will be passed on. She does agree with Mr. Balzarini, there needs to <br /> be more visuals and she asked repeatedly, and she will continue to ask. It may be we do not get them <br /> until the Development Agreement process, then we have to revisit the zoning bylaw line by line. She <br /> would rather push off looking at zoning until we start the Development Agreement process. The <br /> application is not complete yet. She has a lot of questions she is looking for answers to. She would like <br /> the design book for these buildings, better visuals, and the regulating plan showing lot blocks and major <br /> roads. Substantial amounts of this bylaw talk about what happens on a lot, so they need to be <br /> established. They must show us, and they can modify if need be. She asked Mr. Lehrer about the <br /> existing bylaw language pertaining to section E2, regarding the zoning officer. She would like that put in <br /> a packet to then be put on the website. She would like a list of preexisting non-conforming buildings in <br /> section J. Is it every building there already? Somebody needs to make a list of that. The figures in the <br /> back, a lot of them do not have dimensions. They should be big; we cannot read some of this writing. <br /> Peaks of buildings do not have maximum heights. Everything in here needs dimensions. Again, we may <br /> be back at these steps as we have the Development Agreement application and start meeting. <br /> Mr. Hansen had a question on the proposed bylaw change. On page 6 Section H, the Overlay District <br /> dimensional standards, third column over in the table. The minimum lot area has no requirement in the <br /> core area, and transition is 1,700 sq. ft. The edge area is 980 sq. ft as minimum lot size. Footnote <br /> number 1-the minimum lot area of a single-family dwelling in the transition area shall be 2,560 sq. ft. <br /> What does that number mean relative to 1,760 sq. ft. in the table? Then the edge area minimum lot size <br /> of single-family dwelling is 3,600 sq. ft., those two numbers conflict with the table. <br /> Mr. Lehrer said for a single-family dwelling, there is an exception. It requires the transition area lot area <br /> should be larger, a unique minimum lot size, for all other uses it should be shown in the table. There <br /> are 17 special footnotes in our current bylaw that provide exceptions, and on July 7th this will be <br /> elaborated on. <br /> Ms. Waygan had a question about density. The density is a ratio of number of units per acre. They do <br /> not have the densities of different dwelling units per acre. <br /> 4 <br />