Laserfiche WebLink
� 3 / <br /> �o�wn o f�VI as hp e e Planning Boar <br /> d- <br /> G <br /> 16 Great Neck Road North <br /> Aashpee, Aassachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Lehrer is asking for clarity relative to figures. He is interested in what the methodology was to <br /> determine maximum density, it seems arbitrary. How did you come up with that number? This will be <br /> responded to on July 21It <br /> Mr. Hansen asked about page 8 Section L parking requirements C and B. They talk about designated <br /> on street parking in the core area, undesignated on street parking allowed on all streets everywhere <br /> else. If I go drive down a road it is a street. They do not talk about alleys, and he would not expect <br /> parking to be allowed on the alley. Every alley he has ever been down in the city that can pass a <br /> vehicle is full of cars. He does not see anything here that says parking is prohibited in designated <br /> alleyways. <br /> Mr. Phelan mentioned the alley would not allow for parking, it would be zoned that way, and must be <br /> enforced. They cannot stop someone from parking, but the car may be towed. It is something that could <br /> be part of the Agreement. <br /> Mr. Hansen reiterated the word enforcement. He goes on to give a real-life example. Currently there is <br /> a post office with half a dozen spaces that say 15-minute parking for post office" at the Commons now. <br /> There are many cars parked, and one big SUV with a sun visor in the windshield that gave away their <br /> long-term parking. Security at the Commons says they do not control that signage. At the Police <br /> Department, the reception said the officers were busy, then eventually did not want to discuss the <br /> matter after waiting an hour. Who is going to enforce the parking? <br /> Mr. Lehrer wanted to know what he is asking for in terms of better graphic representations. Is he asking <br /> for the design in the anticipated built form? <br /> Ms. Waygan wants some basic lots; the Regulating Plan should have some major blocks and major <br /> roads. Those can have sublots per their design book. They (Mashpee Commons)want maximum <br /> flexibility and we do not have to accept that. Traffic thruways should be shown and on these major <br /> blocks we know what will be built, what height, and what type of design.Of all the pictures, which <br /> picture goes to which block? She has a feeling there is this one area where she thinks they want to put <br /> the picture from page 21. We will be able to see blocks pertaining to these setbacks. These blocks over <br /> here cannot have huge buildings that are connected all in a row. It must look more cottagey or Cape <br /> Cod-ish. We cannot have this discussion without the Regulating Plan noting major roads and major <br /> blocks that you can number and talk about. They have a lot of pictures at an angle, we need the plan <br /> view from the air with dimensions and labels. She likes the colorized pictures, but when you are having <br /> zoning discussions it is difficult. They love green, it means different things in different illustrations. She <br /> would like a black and white plan, full sized not 8x11. She would like to see thruways of traffic. The <br /> Planning Board engineer would move roads over to help with line of sight and line up with other roads. <br /> We should set major connector roads, where people will pass through, lines up so you are not zig <br /> zagging to the connecting road across. <br /> Mr. Lehrer wants the Planning Board to consider, if they are asking for such a detailed Regulating Plan, <br /> the hesitation for a multiphase project to provide a highly detailed Regulating Plan without a mechanism <br /> 5 <br />