Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> a � tv Own ofpeA4astivee PCannina Board <br /> 16 Great Neck RoadWorth <br /> .Mashyee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Hansen wanted some explanation of the 5% of all the buildings, in the chart that allocated the <br /> percentages of how many certain story buildings, he would equate 5% in the largeness of the footprint <br /> meaning one building. <br /> Mr. Feronti explained because it is a framework and somewhat of a formulation, nothing that says this <br /> is the total number of buildings, we try to use existing development as a baseline. Look at a number of <br /> buildings over 58 acres, let's assume there is 50 buildings across that 58 acreage, 5% of that building <br /> type will be 5 stories. Of that 5%, using test fit you can dictate the number of commercial footage and <br /> units, it is hard to answer due to the different ways that a 5 story building can be made up. Hotels are <br /> considered commercial footage. It's a formula for guidance and explanation at how these parameters <br /> were established in the proposed bylaw. <br /> Ms. Waygan agrees with a lot of the comments said with height. She has trouble with whatever it is <br /> being called, 4/4.5 stories, she is having trouble supporting something like that. By way of background, <br /> the LCP certified today, the main mechanism for growth management was lot size, 40,000 sq. ft. and <br /> 80,000 sq. ft. was set to control growth. If we take that mechanism away we have to replace it. We <br /> have a mechanism, open space incentive development bylaw that talks about transfer of development <br /> rights. If you want density and height you have to give us open space. The open space, she wouldn't <br /> support a bylaw with 20% and the way that is used as buffers. She needs something significant off of <br /> the open space incentive development plan, maps where the Town has already approved these. She <br /> doesn't want to see buffers and strips of green, open space incentive development plan, that's what the <br /> Town approved. She is concerned that parking is going to limit square footage. Parking can be waived. <br /> Parking garages can go up. She doesn't want to see the ultimate check and balance she wants to see <br /> codified limits including height and feet. Come up with your range, but absolute height and feet and <br /> there needs to be something about elevator shafts and any mechanicals that go above. This plan <br /> needs to be overlaid on a topo map. In the packet she had 10 questions, eventually would like them all <br /> answered. In her packet there were some diagrams missing from the presentation of lot coverage that <br /> didn't copy over. Just make sure the one of the site gets uploaded correctly. <br /> Mr. Fulone did submit 18 questions including Ms. Waygan's. <br /> Discussion regarding next steps of the Mashpee Commons Development Agreement Local <br /> Review Process and Proposed Community Activity Center Overlay District deliberations <br /> Mr. Lehrer posed the question of where do we go f rom here? In consideration that the Board has <br /> agreed, Mashpee Commons has offered to suspend until they are further along with Development <br /> Agreement process with CCC.At a staff level, he is nearly complete with his buildout. Looking at each <br /> zoning districts at current zoning and developing a rough calculation of what remains to develop, what <br /> could be provided in current, and what remains to be developed in current zoning. He is suggesting <br /> deliberations pause, but we could get some momentum and prepare with more information with where <br /> we are and where we could go as options to consider. <br /> Mr. Fulone notes what it would look like with current zoning has been a hot question. <br /> 5 <br />