Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Nashpee, .Massachusetts o2649 <br />Mr. Fulone noted it approves ability to define. <br />MOTION: <br />Mr. Callahan make a motion to recommend Town Meeting approve to amend §174-3 Terms <br />Defined. Seconded by Mr. Balzarini. All in favor. <br />Warrant Article_ <br />To amend §174-4 Enumeration of Districts <br />Mr. Lehrer stated this article is housekeeping to make a potential overlay district function. All <br />enumerated in text form. <br />Ms. Waygan said this is where she starts to have a conflict with the first vote that went back and <br />forth. <br />Chairman Fulone stated this article is the enumeration of districts, the Town must define in a text <br />form how its districts are laid out. We also have a zoning map, and they must be consistent with <br />one another. <br />Mr. Hansen would assume the same petitioners have signed all these petitions. Are the same 10 <br />minimum signers of all these warrant items? <br />Mr. Lehrer said he cannot say with certainty, but he would assume that is the case. For the <br />remaining housekeeping, terms defined is harmless, it would make sense if you're going to <br />recommend the creation of solar that these other zoning articles be needed. It wouldn't function <br />without them. If you're not going to recommend it, he would say don't vote for these. <br />MOTION: <br />Mr. Callahan makes a motion to recommend Town Meeting approve to amend §174-4 <br />Enumeration of Districts. Seconded by Ms. Waygan. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Ms. Waygan — No, Mr. Callahan — Yes, Mr. Balzarini- Yes, Mr. Fulone- Yes <br />NOTE: For the purposes of consistency with other articles, this motion was rescinded. <br />MOTION: <br />Mr. Callahan makes a motion to rescind previous motion §174-4 regarding Enumeration of <br />Districts. Seconded by Ms. Waygan. All in favor. <br />MOTION: <br />Mr. Callahan makes a motion to recommend Town Meeting approve to amend §174-4 <br />Enumeration of Districts. Seconded by Ms. Waygan. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />10 <br />