Laserfiche WebLink
Town of <br /> N <br /> IG Gireot A\cck Root(,A�wlh <br /> Nmhpee, Alossochusetts 02049 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> SP-2020-19 <br /> Robert L. Lynch Bk.: 11119 <br /> 3 Seconsett Point Road Pg.: 013 <br /> (Map 119 Parcel 2) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on June 8, 2020 by Owner, Robert L. Lynch requesting a Special <br /> Permit under§174-17.1 and §174-33 (Setbacks from wetlands) of the Zoning Bylaws to <br /> raze and replace a non-conforming single family residence with a new single family <br /> residence and garage on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, at 3 Seconsett Point <br /> Road, Map 119 Parcel 2, Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter <br /> 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of general <br /> circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on June 12, 2020 and June 19, 2020 a copy of which <br /> is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the provisions of <br /> Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §9 and the Town of Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall (remote/virtual) on <br /> Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at which time the following members of the Board of Appeals <br /> were present and acting throughout; Chairman,Jonathan Furbush,Vice Chairman,William <br /> Blaisdell, Board Members, Norman J. Gould, Scott Goldstein, and Associate Member <br /> Sharon Sangeleer. <br /> Attorney, Kevin Kir ane represented the application for the homeowners and were present. <br /> Also present was Todd Carson,Rick with Brown,Lindquist,Fenuccio&Raber Architects, <br /> and Kieran Healy, with BSC Group. This is a request to raze and replace a pre-existing, <br /> non-conforming structure. The existing building is non-conforming and is setback from the <br /> southerly boundary line at 9.7 ft. The setback from the northerly boundary is 13.6 ft. The <br /> requirement for the side and rear is 15 ft. The setback from the wetlands is 14.1ft., and the <br /> requirement is 50 ft. Therefore, the building is non-conforming in those three aspects. <br /> The proposed structure will improve for two of the setbacks that are non-conforming, and <br /> eliminates one of those setbacks that is non-conforming. The setback from the northerly <br /> boundary line will be 15 ft., and that conforms to the current setbacks. The setbacks from <br /> the southerly boundary line is 10.5 ft., and the setbacks from the wetlands increases to 16.7 <br /> ft. This has eliminated the non-conformity on the northerly side and improves the <br /> conditions on the southerly side, and the distance to the wetland resource area. <br /> 1 <br />