My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/01/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
12/01/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 5:24:43 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 4:09:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/01/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
`U y Mll y, <br /> Town of ilashpee PCanntnA Board <br /> 16 Great Neck Road Worth <br /> Nashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Mr. Phelan noted the entrance of this development is the determination of the sidewalk. <br /> Mr. Lehrer pointed out the sidewalk easement running across the frontage, then the crosswalk across <br /> the street and side walk continues. <br /> Ms. Waygan added the wider the entranceways the more value a lot has. They might lose some land <br /> but it really makes a difference. That first lot, doesn't that have incentive zoning? <br /> Mr. Lehrer confirmed the first front lots are C3 limited commercial, with the rear portion industrial. It's <br /> not incentive but alternative. There is some flexibility on those front lots for different types of uses. <br /> Ms. Waygan stated you can have a restaurant there. Can you put a dance studio in these rare lots? A <br /> 35 foot entrance way ends up boosting the value of whatever goes in. <br /> Mr. Kirrane pointed out a portion of this lot to the rear is residential. <br /> Mr. Lehrer said there was a 40B proposed on this site at one point. Relative to the waiver request, it is <br /> in complete discretion of the Board to grant that waiver. So long that the greater of 800 ft. is desirable, <br /> due to topography, and other conditions. Also, for any subdivision that produces 8 units or more, the <br /> Postmaster is going to require a cluster box unit. The Planning Board has no discretion or authority of <br /> that mailbox. If you show the Postmaster your plan he will approve it. On the definitive filing show the <br /> appropriate turn off for vehicles to retrieve mail. He would recommend touching base with local <br /> Postmaster. <br /> Mr. Healy noted page 3, there is a section specifically for that. There is a space cleared wide enough <br /> for a vehicle. He is not sure it has been submitted to Postmaster or not. He created a space wide <br /> enough to fit a vehicle. <br /> Mr. Lehrer elaborated it was a recent rule change, and some new property owners were unable to get <br /> their mail delivered. It's to the benefit of future property owners to make sure it's rectified at definitive <br /> filing. <br /> Mr. Phelan noted fire hydrants are dispersed in maximum 500 ft. increments, he suspects there will be <br /> at least two here. <br /> Mr. Healy proposed three at 500 ft. intervals. <br /> Mr. Phelan stated they cannot be spaced apart more than 500 feet. You can always shorten the <br /> distance.Wherever the hydrant is on Rt. 130, if there isn't one nearby, you may have to install at the <br /> front. <br /> Mr. Fulone referenced one at the entrance and two on the road. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.