Laserfiche WebLink
w:. <br /> this report? Mr. Bent said they would. The Board agreed <br /> that there was no reason to spend time on it because the <br /> same questions will be raised on this subdivision Mr . Bent <br /> did meet with Tom to begin to resolve some of those <br /> questions . <br /> Tina Cokanhower, geologist from Horsley, Witten, Megemann, <br /> Inc. presented water quality study. She presented to <br /> copies of report to the Board. She briefly reviewed results <br /> of report: the northern portion of subdivision is located <br /> within zone of contribution of proposed Mashpee well PI2 , <br /> the Western portion of property is located on the zone of <br /> ' F contribution of the Falmouth Fresh Pond well which is <br /> ""T <br /> ""-R� <br /> existing and 2 proposed wells. The report takes into <br /> account 5 criteria: first they documented existing water <br /> F quality, second they calculated existing nitrogen loading <br /> within each zone, third they did a full build out analysis, <br /> fourth they calculated what quantity of nitrogen would have <br /> to be loaded to produce critical levels, and finally if <br /> ==` future loading exceeded permissible rates, calculated what <br /> the allowable loading rates for future subdivisions in each <br /> zone would be. <br /> f <br /> The report concluded that in Mashpee well P12. the existing <br /> quality is very good present, the nitrogen contribution is <br /> very low, there is very little development in zone, under <br /> e' full build out nitrogen levels will remain well below <br /> critical. levels. <br /> Falmouth Fresh Pond well, under Mashpee criteria, water <br /> ql <br /> uality would exceed critical levels urldcz fu1l bu41d ou . . <br /> Using the other criteria used, it would be just below <br /> critical levels . Ms . Cokanhower strongly supports the <br /> 7 , alternative criteria because it is specific to Cape Cod and <br /> r�. most up to date . They recommend no mitigation be required. <br /> ' Tom mentioned that the report assumed the town land adjacnt <br /> rs to the proposed subdivision would not be developed, however <br /> recent plans are to build a Junior High School. <br /> Tony would like to know what kinds of future activities <br /> could happen that would bring it up to critical level 1 .e. <br /> how many gallons per day. <br /> F 7 � T T� � �+ + .; - t. <br /> f The Board tn4 n revieT�ed Charlie ' s comments . r�1.� �:�.a� <br /> ' concerns were over some drainage areas . Plans show a <br /> ` presence of clay in three locations and just � <br /> subdivision there is an area of wetland and directly across <br /> } from it is shown as an area for drainage. He is concerned <br /> there is not enough depth. Most other concerns were <br /> housekeeping items . He is also concerned with grading of <br /> roads outside of subdivision would like to see road <br /> U profiles <br /> 7 <br />