Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> r <br /> Chairman +vaygan: "That's not on the agenda Joe. I'm sorry,that's not on the agenda. I'm sorry." <br /> Mr. Mu11 in: "So I'm not taking part of that." <br /> hainn n aygan: `'well it's a full Planning Board meeting, you're a Planning Board member, we <br /> elected you to be on the Planning Board, so I hope-that you can come." <br /> Mr. Mullin: "You elected me, I can resign." <br /> Chairman waygan: " . . <br /> Mr. Fudala inquired about how to approve the Green Parks Subcommittee meeting utes. It was <br /> suggested that a single meeting occur to approve the minutes. There was concern expressed about <br /> meeting at 6 p.rm during the dinner hour. It was determined that the next meeting would begin at <br /> p.m. and a Subcommittee meeting would occur 5 minutes prior to the meeting. There was <br /> discussion regarding how Subcommittee would meet without running into a problem, and it was <br /> noted that typically it would not be comprised of a quorum of one particular group. The Chair <br /> stated that there were members interested in the green parks and others that were not. The <br /> Subcommittee will be dissolved at the next meeting. Mr. Rowley recommended that. reference to <br /> Route 128 in the Minutes be ganged to route 151. <br /> Mashpee Commons Development Agreement-regarding the(Development Agreement, Ms. <br /> waygan stated that the February I 'b deadline was fast approaching. According to the letter from <br /> Mashpee Commons, they had internally reviewed pursuing a tfi-party agreement among Mashpee <br /> Commons', the'Town of Mashpee and Mashpee Commons. Mashpee Commons has now decided <br /> that the tri-party did not make sense, and also noted that it created"confusion and an. ietyl' among <br /> the three parties as well as it being a duplication of the permitting process. The Chair suggested that <br /> the Manning Board respond to the letter, including a-statement that the Board was not under the <br /> impression that confusion or anxiety was being caused by the Development Agreement_ In <br /> addition, the Chair believed that the Board had voted to pursue the Tri-Party Development <br /> Agreement, and, although there was not yet a consensus on individual items, the Cape Cod <br /> Commission had advised the Board not to discuss certain details until the application was filed. <br /> Mr. Balzarini stated that he was disappointed that Mr. Storrs suggested there was confusion when <br /> there was no confusion on the park of the-PI ng Board. Mr. Mullin agreed. Mr. Balzarini <br /> expressed concern that it happened before when there was discussion about transferring land for <br /> Steeple Street and the plan changed to construct 40B which would be outside of consideration of the <br /> Panning Board. "Trout Pond was also removed from the development planning once concern was <br /> expressed about the area. <br /> Chairman Waygan noted that it would be difficult to offer special waivers if the Planning Board <br /> could not review the entire project and its benefit to the pub]ic. Mr. Kooh Tian agreed that he <br /> would need to review the entire scope of the project to make decisions. Mr. Fudala stated that <br /> Mashpee Commons could do nothing but commercial without approval from the Planning Board for <br /> a co merci l center bylaw involving a transfer of development rights in from other properties. <br /> Cape Cod Commission approval of a Development Agreement could not occur unless the project <br /> conformed to the Zoning Bylaw which will require a Special Permit. 'Where was discussion about <br /> 6 <br />