Laserfiche WebLink
Dennis asked about the timber walls? Tom said there are no records on that either. <br /> Torn said there needs to be an engineering study on all of the wall. <br /> He suggests also separating out the retaining gall issue from the rest of the review. <br /> - Dennis asked why there are 3 types of wall? + <br /> Mr. Bonvie replied that a lot of engineering,went into the wall; each has a reason why its.located <br /> where it is. He has documentation on inspections,photos, etc., i.e. wood has less structural need. <br /> New Section Layout Plans- <br /> -Tom suggests revising these for a less stringent standard (currently At 1 OOh of a foot . <br /> The setbacks do not take decks-into account horver, zoning bylaws-do not eenpt them from <br /> setbacks. This needs to be addressed. <br /> Grading and utility plan <br /> are no-.supplemental parking pads for quads. . <br /> drainage in some areas is being re-designed. This needs to be resolved. <br /> Quad Building :14 i s only 26 ft.from retaining wall, decks are only 14 R from top of the wall. <br /> In Tom's opinion, the quad is too large for the space available and would suggest not approving <br /> the.change of this building;=from a duplex to a quad . He suggests akin #15.a ud. <br /> gg g <br /> Landscaping Supplmnental Plan: o .Dec 19 there was a.site visit with the-developer, <br /> surveyor, <br /> landscape committee and Town Planner to view existing trees at Drivers lane. It-is Ragged at 10 <br /> aun20 ft and will make individual decision about which trees can be saved. It was an <br /> excellent process. <br /> i Loop at effect of trees on retaining wall <br /> Road plan Profiles: will leave,comments to Charlie Rowley <br /> Summary I e omrnendation:-sepamte the pond.and-retaining-walls-from this review process. <br /> Tonight, put all the information on the table,let the developers review and respond-to comments <br /> and at the next meeting try to come to some agreement, at the Feb 4th meeting hopefully finalize <br /> a decision and set of plans. It is a very ambitious schedule. <br /> Beverly said the developer now has a detailed report With hard question and need to begin work <br /> on it clw kly. { <br /> Will the town have to bear the cost of the engineering work to be clone by Charlie Rowley for <br /> this project? <br /> Torn explained they have been sending Mr. Rowleys bill to Mr. Bnvie for payment. Mr. <br /> Bonvie,said,they are happy to pay for Mr. Rowl y's work. <br /> Charlie said.he will concentrate on the Plans for the new development first, then will f us on the <br /> .retain.ing=walls and pond drainage. He will provide a copy of that report.to the Board and to Mr. <br /> Bon-vie as soon as it is complete. <br /> PUBLIC COMAENTS <br /> d Palle-n n , 121 Fells Pond lid said he lost his home-when the Board excluded the 2 quads <br /> behind the wall. He signed a contract for that unit in May and has been waiting, confident that <br /> this meeting they would be Duren permission to build. He has been renting a house and a in <br /> p g <br /> storage fee. He is-in limbo. <br /> _ Dennis explained the Board is concerned about the safety of the walls. <br />