Laserfiche WebLink
association would like to see them.. He is hoping for flexibility from the Planning-Board on <br /> locating there. will work towards-agreement by all parties. <br /> Supplemental Landscape Flan - as requested by Torn Ful data for the next 50 units to come one <br /> ■ <br /> one. <br /> Dennis asked, for each sub phase, going:forward, will these plans be provided and this procedure <br /> followed? Attomey Dunning.said it is. <br /> What is the source of water for the irri i on` <br /> Mr. Bonvie said 120 units are on town water. They are going through.the appfoval process.-for <br /> their own on site well and distribution system. <br /> Everyone reviewed the staff report; Tom discussed the most-important-issues; <br /> -.history of the project <br /> - issue of things built which were not supposed to be <br /> -review of procedures <br /> - listing of ail plans subrrdtted to date Ho wever,today,-the Planning Dept. received new plans <br /> and these convents do not reflect that. <br /> - #7 Pg 7, error it set back from center line, should be checked. <br /> - Concerns about retaining wall; none ofit has been inspected by the Building Inspector <br /> -#14, page-8.. existing t plan has a 4 ft wide paved walkway not shown on the plan. It should be <br /> since it effects the.landscaping supplementary plan. <br /> There needs to be a plan ofwhere the-additional pang pads are proposed to g . <br /> - #1 :-there is an unmanned.construction entrance which.mush be aaddress d. <br /> - concern about damage being done to Pyamps Road by construction.trucks <br /> o: plan does not show where the club house was supposed to be. Because of-that change, there <br /> is the need for retaining galls . <br /> -there were limits on clearing-in the original plan which was not adhered to throughout the <br /> project,which is why-we have an improvement plan now. . <br /> - concerns about buildings being close and providing screening between building; use-landscape <br /> plan to d.o that and to break tip large, u.nlndscape ,fares . <br /> The intent is-to add trees, need to see on the plan'h w'th t will work. <br /> Request that the landscape plan be done at the same scale as the other plans. <br /> Tom is suggesting taking they pond improvement-plan out of these-plans and making it a separate <br /> issue-so as not to hold up this-review/approval process,. <br /> Charlie added that should include all land within 100 feet ofthe pond, which Cons C m has <br /> jurisdiction over. <br /> 14: there are.burros and buffers between some buildings and-not others: Should be looked at, <br /> may be some landscaping to be-added. <br /> Deed landscaping to screen large utility boxes <br /> - no additional landscaping is planned on Old Barnstable Rd. There is onto about losing trees <br /> with the road widening. May want to add plantings or solid fence <br /> Concerns about the man made pond: rain on top,of frozen pond, life expectancy of-pond liner, <br /> adequacy of drainage pit for overflow,concern about outlets.getting clogged. <br /> Retaining lls: there are no plans of retaining walls.. Concerns-about safety. <br /> There i -no record of inspections of soils before redi rock wall was installed. No record of _ <br /> 4 <br />