Laserfiche WebLink
The Town Planner took issue with language "`approximate <br /> .only" suggesting a limit be set with regard to flexibility <br /> as to the distance required .to achieve level ground, to b <br /> included in the Board' s written decision. <br /> The Board agreed to set a limit of 3-feet . <br /> Page 6 - Installation of sidewalk/retaining well. <br /> The Town Planner noted there are two different <br /> conflicting notes with regard to the retaining wall . He. <br /> suggested the inclusion of an arrow for clarity. <br /> Page 7 - Addition of a retaining wall for the purpose <br /> f preserving- the sidewalk and existing trees, which has <br /> been approVed by the Zoning Board of Appeals on the PGA <br /> Plan to be considered by- the` P-banning Board -next month. <br /> Proposed relocation of -parking spaces, being requested by <br /> unit owners . <br /> Page 8 - Tennis shelter changed from -feet t -feet <br /> in width. <br /> i <br /> There being no further Board dis ussion the Chairman <br /> opened the floor to Public comment <br /> Violet cortlandt, 10 Bonwood Drive Stated that when <br /> s-he purchased her property the original, plan showed a <br /> parking pad, which has nearer been completed. She spare to <br /> a safety issue and made reference to a letter submitted to <br /> the Rlanni g Board/Staff.. <br /> _ r. Bonvie responded in his capacity as Association <br /> President, explaining the pads are not exclusive right <br /> pads, which means anyone can park in these spaces, they are. <br /> i <br /> provided to accommodate parking overflow/guest parking. If <br /> these pads are located at a duplex or to the side of a <br /> single unit they tend to become exclusive parking to the <br /> unit owner. <br /> r. Bonvi,e stated from the Association standpoint, a <br /> parking pad should n t be added to a driveway in order t <br /> avoi.d exclusive use. He further stated the plans have been <br /> amended and no longer- include a space at this location. <br /> 1 <br />