Laserfiche WebLink
to do so should now be assumed by the Developer, not the <br /> homeowner. <br /> Myrna Duey stated that after inspection, she feels the <br /> trees being referred to on Mr. Maloney' s s property are in <br /> fact a safety concern and should be removed. <br /> It was the general consensus of the Board that <br /> determination o-f financial responsibility was not in their <br /> jurisdiction and suggested this matter be discussed and <br /> resolved with the Developer. <br /> t this point Mr. Bon- vie noted that the trees under <br /> discussion had been flagged to be s°aved on the approved <br /> plan and that measures had been taken to do so. The 'Town <br /> Planner agreed that in this instance the Developer had <br /> conformed to Planning Board instruction at the time, which <br /> was to preserve those trees regardless -of the proximity t <br /> the buildings . <br /> Mr. Bonie suggested he meet with the concerned residents <br /> and the Association in order to make an attempt to resolve <br /> this (financial) responsibility/matter; to which the Board <br /> agreed and recognized as a cooperative effort on the part <br /> f the Developer. <br /> Gail Barnes, Par 'Three Court - Recognized this matter <br /> a .a learning experience for everyone involved. In going <br /> forward with the development she recommended to the <br /> Developer that the arborist be invited included to walk the <br /> site when making determinations as to identifying those <br /> trees for preservation as well as for removal . Both the <br /> Developer and the Planning Board agreed this was an <br /> excellent suggestion to be carried forth. <br /> Brenda, Halfond, Pine HillBlvd. - Made reference to <br /> the earlier statements made to- the "learning experience"' <br /> stating for the Record, "Mr. Bonvi e already }anew, everyone <br /> else lea.rned. " <br /> Jim 1cCorm'icl , E ecutive Drive - Suggested that the <br /> two Planning Board Members ers who made are inspection and <br /> subsequent recommendations/evaluation to the Board a-re not <br /> qualified to do so with reference to landscaping and hazard <br /> issues. He -suggested a professional opinion in this matter <br /> be obtained. <br /> 1.1 <br />