Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> i <br /> The water wa-s not draining into the soil, but rather <br /> sitting in a. puddle- around the new planting. <br /> The Association suggested the Developer plant <br /> aPpro i.mately six- trees, mounded, approximately 8 to 10 <br /> ft. high for privacy and coverage to the view of the <br /> treatrrmnt plant bu-ild-ing. <br /> Mr. Quinn objected stated that at the time of the sale, <br /> f the property the buyers were- aware of the location of <br /> the building and agreed to these conditions as r .flected in <br /> the overall price of the purchase. <br /> 1r. Quinn further objected to the- suggestion- for <br /> additional plantings or a -stone wall for coverage, citing <br /> the extra work/expense this would involve. He further <br /> stated the. purchase had been made approximately 1 1,1 years <br /> ago with the buye ' s knowledge- ahnd consent to the view of <br /> the building. <br /> .Theme was dics-sion regarding the viible phone cable <br /> entwined .a.round the trees . Mr.. Quinn expla�'ined Verizon is <br /> responsible to remove said cable and that everything would <br /> eventua l l y :b e underground. <br /> The Planning Board granted permission to remove a dead <br /> spruce tree at Unit 4 . <br /> Treatment Plant Center <br /> Power Line <br /> Mr. Quinn explained h'e, is unable to construct anything <br /> at this site—a-s it is located- on ea-sement property. He did <br /> say that the- area would be cleaned up and all equipment <br /> removed When all construction has been completed.. <br /> John Gugliotta suggested plantings along the side of <br /> the road; to which -Mr. Bornstein refused, stating the area <br /> would remain in its natural state. <br /> The Association expressed their desire to have this. <br /> area Finished. Mr. Bornst.ein would not agree t.o this <br /> additional work. <br /> It was suggested that the Association attempt to come <br /> to so-me compromise with the homeowners across the street . <br /> 4 <br />