Laserfiche WebLink
when we expressed concern this week to the construction people on <br /> job the their answer was "Th �at was the other builder, we aren' t � � w <br /> paying any attention to that} . Unit 44, Craig; Unit 45, ' <br /> a <br /> Schofield sustained extensive damage from the flooding before the <br /> -- - correction b B I ` g <br /> y Byrne. n the case of Unit 45 there was over Five �. <br /> N `= Thousand t$5, 000 . 00) Dollars loss of personalproperty <br /> p <br /> (inaudible) extensive repair done to the lower level b the i d <br /> original builder. The y � { <br /> � � condominium Board refused to allow the � � <br /> original builder to be taken over until corrective m ea sure s were <br /> taken. Byrne Development fulfilled their agreement, but � <br /> Northland is destroying all of the`.� Y g preventative buildings from <br /> ' berms and drainage that was put in by Byrne. was the Planning <br /> ,.. Board ever informed of this situation? we appreciate anything + <br /> you can do to help P us prevent flooding of our homes. Sincerely. <br /> '= Alfred and Jean Schofield. " <br /> following The Chairman read the f of <br /> g letter dated February 14, <br /> 999, to the attention of Eric Twarog into the Re y <br /> cord �t <br /> thank-you for the hone message y P that the Planning Board would be <br /> r`. . February 17 from hearing on <br /> y th the Town Engineer on the potential <br /> flooding situation caused by Northlands construction i <br /> _ n the back <br /> of our home. To update you a bit, this situation is even more h << <br /> our 1 <br /> : e t t e r fbuildings <br /> --, serious than stated in o January 8th, Two <br /> Y �f � <br /> have been built in back of Units 45 and 46 here at_ Stratford <br /> Ponds the foundations are higher than the existing units and the <br /> d has been graded toward the area in back of the of � }der <br /> homes. The two drainage pits that were absorbing excess water in <br /> the case of the flooding have both been filled in. The e drainage <br /> now seems to be directed towards the terminal drain in the back .,,• : a <br /> of Unit 45 . That drain retains the storm water that flows from <br /> Elizabeth Drive and at resent flows like ` <br /> p e a fountain, in other words, water erupts out of it at the height of several inches <br /> J from theg I <br /> force of the water in cases of � rain.heavy Byrne <br /> y <br /> Construction placed the berm across the backyard of Unit 45 <br /> - � y to <br /> further contain the water. we have no:. t had any real heavy <br /> i <br /> ranstorm since the berm was installed but has fill ed to the to <br /> of the hole with ordinary storms n ' g <br /> �:� • y and any additional water flowing <br /> t � � <br /> o that area will certainly flood further. As you know, <br /> s y y , we have <br /> photographs of that basin +' t <br /> s n flooded with almost a foot of water. y <br /> we do <br /> not want a repeat of those episodes. Thanks for our help. t;Sincerely, y � <br /> incerely, Al and Jean Schofield. "The Consulting <br /> Engineer informed the Board that the ' '`' <br /> inspection c t ion h ` 11.1 <br /> P e conducted at Bishops Park is not the same area as f <br /> is under discussion this evening and apologized, for any. <br /> Miscommunication. i <br /> Mr. Rowley also stated he has had a discussion ` <br /> With Mr.. Thul in of Thul in Engineering, who assured <br /> him of a, <br /> solution to this problem. Mr. Rowley suggested Mr. Thul in appear <br /> pP � <br /> ` g Board before the Planning • ' .• �, <br /> yz#• a d for the purpose of requesting an <br /> approval to meet with him in order to discuss this situation. <br /> F <br /> At this point, <br /> p t, Mr. Dawley suggested the Board review the <br /> � <br /> drawings in order to understand the drainage. He stated 1 g' the � <br /> -2 r <br /> µ' <br />