Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Aecu7 i, Southport said the days of wooden poles are gone; you don't put wood in dirt. <br /> Bennis suggested this is a matter for the Association and Mr. Bonvie to work out. <br /> Bev said this was discussed 2 weeks ago, thought there would be an agreement. She is <br /> disappointed it has not been resolved and it could hold up the approval process. <br /> Tom said the special permit calls for lighting design; something needs to be done. <br /> Listing of changes made to those plans, Toni reviewed the list <br /> p. The developer has objected to requiring approval ofconsulting engineer for r taina'ng wall. <br /> Charlie said since it is under the jurisdiction of the buiIdin g inspector, his approval is needed; <br /> Charlie agrees the construction of the wall is no under his authority to approved since it is subject <br /> to a building permit. <br /> The Board agreed to tape consulting engineer out <br /> q. Addition of hydro seed <br /> s. Structural plans - design will be received by Feb. 1 ". <br /> Charlie Rowley letter of 1 : most issues have been resolved. Page 2 of site plan has some <br /> corrections to be made to set backs. Visitor parking is not clarified. <br /> There is only a 10%.grade on most roads,.which is very flat. He recommends paying ver close <br /> attention to grade when paving. Timber retaining wall will be left to building inspector to <br /> permit. Mentions the slope of the boulder wall, which tonight, decided to hydro seed. Rolled <br /> berm needed on'Leisure Green Dr. No. <br /> Fern asked if any of these items have not yet been addressed' <br /> Mr. Bonvie said he hopes they can be considered nninor items, since he just got the,letter tonight. <br /> Beverly asked the Board members if they feel the Board is ire a position to made a decision <br /> tonight, with these issues still outstanding? <br /> Don asked about the issue of landscaping around the fence, in front, which was raised in Linda <br /> F'letcher's letter? <br /> Torn said it-is not addressed in the draft decision, the Board had not specified that previously. <br /> Mr. Bonvie feels they are complying with the requirements for the perimeter fence. <br /> Don said, from his observation, it is a natural vegetative state, with a lot of cover high but not <br /> much low. How can more of a buffer zone be created? <br /> I enm*s said this has been addressed previously and the conclusion was to leave a natural <br /> vegetation -don't change the character. <br /> Ilrir. Bonvie agrees; it is required to be an indigenous buffer zone. <br /> Attomey funning explained action was brought by abutters in 1 ,.and, as a result a consent <br /> stipulation was entered into and recorded, requiring the buffer remain as it was.. <br /> Linda Fletcher is concerned about safety and the lack of security the fence provides. <br /> Gail Barnes, stating,her.opinion, not that of landscape committee. She understands the concerns <br /> of unit owners along Old Barnstable Ind, because traffic lights shine into the houses. when Old <br /> Barnstable Rd is widened, there will be a further reduction of buffer. Concerns are for safety and <br /> sound. <br /> Mr. Bonvie again reviewed the litigation history. ZBA, developer and abutters are party to the <br /> agreement. required a black fence, so it would blend in. <br /> 6 <br />