My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/04/2004 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
02/04/2004 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2022 5:03:08 PM
Creation date
1/21/2022 10:04:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/04/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of this discussion and work need never had occurred if a building permit had been obtained in the <br /> first place. In the end, it is important that everyone have their needs satisfied. <br /> Tom asked about plans for re-vegetation at the base of the wall, there are no landscape plans for <br /> that area. <br /> Mr. l onvie said it will discussed at time ofRDA. They-will start with Cons Com and then curve <br /> back to this Board. <br /> Tom said that needs to be reflected in the conditions. <br /> Mr. Bologna is prepared as built plans for the building permit. will be available next week. <br /> Tura said the decision should be conditioned on getting that plan <br /> Don asked if there is any ongoing-maintenance or testing to a done on the wall over its life? <br /> Charlie said not to the best of his knowledge. Concrete has a long.life expectancy. <br /> Mr. Pears, Kettle Dane asked if'roots of planting will have any effect on the gall? <br /> Mr. l onvie said that is common are and can control plantings of large trees. <br /> When will the Board get the landscape plans for the base of the wall"? lair. Bonnie said It is <br /> contingent on Cons Conn. Will file RDA immediately. <br /> Torn suggested preparing-a plan, give it to the Board next meeting, but are subject to Cons Conn <br /> approval. <br /> P. Man Made Pond: Charlie said he did not have time to-study it. will have a report for next <br /> meeting. <br /> G. Architectural Plans <br /> H. Boulder Retaining Nall: <br /> Charlie Rovler's comments. In,Tune, 03,Charlie provided a later to Southport because he <br /> observed erosion at that wall. They did add chip stone which stemmed the problem but <br /> Vegetation would help. <br /> H only has plans showing contours and slope. <br /> Don asked if there are plans to add vegetation to prevent future erosion? <br /> Mr. l onvie thought it had been stabilized. He would be happy to put hydro seed over it. <br /> This is not under the Jurisdiction of the building rnspector. <br /> The Planning Board wants that wall to be hydro seeded. <br /> 1. Street lights, poles and fixture design. <br /> Mr. Bonvie would like to continue to install the style of poles that are being used now, for phase <br /> I and H.. They are wood but have a lifetime warranty. Phase III can have a discussion about a <br /> new product. <br /> Mr. Ditritis, Southport, said there is the same style pole which is painted metal and cement base. <br /> The replacement costs ofthe wood poles will fall on the association. <br /> Mr. l onvie said the warranty passes to the association. <br /> Mr. Johnson said if the original poles are failing after 13 years, something is wrong with <br /> installation. They are only failing at the soil contact. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.