My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/28/1999 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/28/1999 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2022 5:06:25 PM
Creation date
1/21/2022 10:08:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c. <br /> �f <br /> l <br /> S t , <br /> The Town Planner reviewed the PlanningBoard had submitted <br /> ' � - <br /> t ted <br /> said Article, which the Selectmen later amended, and which is to ' <br /> be reviewed, discussed and voted for approval at this Meeting, w ` <br /> The Town Planner further explained that the Bylaw now <br /> recognizes the Planning Board to be the agency to negotiate and <br /> recommend approval of the Development Agreement to the ,P g e Selectmen, <br /> who will in turn either accept the Planning Board recommendation <br /> or request reconsideration thereof, <br /> qu <br /> There being no discussion from the Board or Members of the <br /> Public in this matter, the Chairman entertained a motion for <br /> recommendation be made. ,, -W N,' <br /> J%. <br /> MOTION: Martine Meijering made a Motion to recommend r� <br /> approval of Article #31, as printed in the Town warrant for look. <br /> May 31 1999; which Motion was seconded by James Dorgan and so <br /> 0unanimously,ted y <br /> vg <br /> � <br /> Growth Management Bylaw-Article #37-174-26 <br /> oil <br /> The Town Planner explained the intent of said Bylaw would be '. <br /> to reduce the annual number of building permits issued by the <br /> Town from approximately one hundred ninety-seven (197) to sixty <br /> (60) ; and to reduce the annual maximum build out rate for any <br /> individual project from twenty (2 o%) percent to fifteen 15 W <br /> percent. . <br /> r � <br /> The Chairman made reference to and read into the Record a ;,, . ° ;• <br /> letter dated April 20, 1999, to Mashpee Planning Board., from <br /> Douglas S. Storrs, Mashpee Commons Limited. Partnership: "I would p <br /> like to take this opportunity to express my belief that Article, <br /> 37, a proposed amendment to Section 174-2 p � submitted by petition, <br /> i , <br /> is not in the best interest of our community, and I would like to •. <br /> encourage the Board to vote against the endorsement of this <br /> amendment. I believe that all members of the community <br /> Mashpee � {p <br /> share the common goal of providing for managed and sustainable <br /> growth within the Town. Appropriate and extensive planning by <br /> the T <br /> a own Planner, the Planning Board and the public has resulted <br /> in an approved Local Comprehensive Plan. This, combined with the <br /> regulatory powers of the Town boards, the Cape Cod Commission and ; , <br /> s. �. <br /> various state agencies, provides appropriate safeguards for the „ <br /> natural resources and environment of Mashpee. I feel, and I ';yr <br /> trust the Board agrees, that the proposed extension of build-out E <br /> periods ` <br /> A , iods for specific ro `ects and a town wide reduction of <br /> building � � � � ��•. <br /> ding permits to 60 per year does not achieve the goals <br /> articulated by the Petition Article, The preamble to Article 37 -;X 4 <br /> states that the purpose behind the amendment is to "guard against ►:�' <br /> large variations in growth rates which adversely of fect the ! <br /> To � g' y . �. <br /> wn s environmental resources, economy and land values. I amconfid <br /> Brit that the provisions of the existing growth management �1 <br /> bylaw, <br /> • the existing zoning and subdivision bylaws and the A, <br /> extensive review and inherent protection vested in the municipal <br /> -3- ,+ <br /> 14 <br /> a4 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.