Laserfiche WebLink
i 1 <br /> g <br /> M <br /> T <br /> overall unit count of one hundred Sixty-one <br /> �1�l} would not be <br /> changed* <br /> At this point mr. Dawley was makingreferencevisual,to a <br /> "David c. Thul in. PE PLS, Buildings and Roads Stratford <br /> e f� . Said P1forty-eight <br /> o d Pond/ <br /> Stratford Ridge" . an shows forty-eight (4 S) units and <br /> sl fight ly more square footage of open space within the Phase. <br /> s <br /> The Town Planner original '��' <br /> questioned the or�g�nal open space line. as X ( <br /> indicated on the Plan, notingthe perimeter ;ill) , <br /> p zmeter buffer has been A <br /> reduced. He also pointed out the fact that Town conservation <br /> � <br /> land abuts both sides. <br /> It was the consensus of the Board and the Town Planner` <br /> that <br /> although the proposals being made were site plan <br /> were significant , p changes, they <br /> enough to warrant a Modification of the Special <br /> � <br /> p <br /> Permit. The Board further suggested Applicant provide any <br /> of the twoproposals. p overlay <br /> The chairman determined there was no public comment in <br /> this <br /> matter which concluded at 8 : 12 <br /> p.m. <br /> � <br /> Non-Agenda Item <br /> Application-windchime Point <br /> File Plan, Discuss Fees, Bond <br /> Ito <br /> The Town Planner explained <br /> Applicantr has filed anApplication with Town clerk; and � <br /> is presenting additional <br /> materials to the Planning Board.. The Town Planner also suggested <br /> the Board establish a fee amount •� ;; <br /> . <br /> The chairman recognized Mr. Roberts who resented elevations <br /> 1 ex bui p <br /> of the three-p buildings, as had been requested by the Board. ,N <br /> After some discussion by the Board it was agreed to <br /> calculate the Filing g <br /> and Review Fthirty-five ■ � <br /> g ees based upon the .. <br /> (35) units currently under consideration in the M 'odzf icatzon <br /> process. {� <br /> MOTION: Dennis Balzarini made a Motion to schedule a Public �. <br /> Hearing in this matter for June <br /> 16, 1999 at 7: ao p.m. • which chMation was seconded by James Dorgan and so voted unanimously. <br /> The Town Planner provided a proposal regarding the Bond, <br /> language. H ,P p g g' <br /> e commented the original language of the Bond � <br /> presented to the Board had been vague and based upon a treatment <br /> Plant beingbull p ' <br /> d. The language e being proposed b the Town <br /> g g g p p Y <br /> Planner would assure use of the Bond money should sh 1 <br /> there be any <br /> problems/violations connected with exceedingt level <br /> nitrogen gen sat <br /> discharge and/or excessive levels of nutrients in the groundwater <br /> or in the River. s chars e were also made to the second R <br /> g d paragraph <br /> regarding account reduction. <br /> � #L 1 <br /> i <br /> 4W ' <br /> - . .! j <br /> { . 40 <br />