Laserfiche WebLink
-•._mot-j....—._...�....__—.. <br /> I■ <br /> } <br /> h <br /> 10 <br /> Under Growth <br /> Yee r Management B law Exem = <br /> 1996 64 63 127 , <br /> 1997 108 <br /> 81 189 <br /> 1995 115 178 293 ' <br /> (101 Southport) w' <br /> 1999 <br /> Furst Half of Year 77 68 <br /> t <br /> Mr.Fudala stated that he had been talldng with Mr.Bill Hauck,Mas Buildingr �' <br /> and they felt that a number between 100 and 150 would be a good number which n fight make �$ <br /> sense. # ` <br /> There was discussion concerning whether this number between 100 and 150 would include � <br /> the permits which are considered exempt. <br /> j, " <br /> Thomas Analetto,a resident of Mashpee,stated that he agrees that the number should.be � <br /> fixed and he suggested taking the numbers from the previous years,average the numbers that , <br /> are under the Growth Management ' 'Bylaw,and divide by the number of years,and set the i <br /> number at that. He sued that he feels the building should be slowed down. He stated that _ , <br /> there is no need to increase the number of permits per year. Mr.Analetto stated that he felt a ; <br /> number between 100 and 150 is too high. <br /> Mr.Dorgan noted that because the number listed for 1999 is for 1/z year,you would have to <br /> double that number for the whole year,thus averaging out to be 110. '' °!�!r <br /> Mr.Fred white,Builder,stated that he feels 150 is a reasonable number because he doesn't <br /> believe the single lot homeowner should be penalized and yet give more than that number of <br /> permits to big construction.on. He commented that the number should be somewhere between 1 <br /> 125 and 150. <br /> k <br /> Mr.Fudala noted that at the time the number of 200 was determined to be put into the <br /> Comprehensive Plan,they did not really look at what was being exempted and so he believes <br /> Y <br /> f H1 �4p <br /> the number is for a total number of combined exempt and special permits. <br /> '`s <br /> Bill Hauck commented that if you cut the number too tight,you could risk the el i1mination of �t <br /> any Open Space development. In addition,he noted that if the number is set too low,it could k4l_'i. 1 <br /> eliminate the developers coming in and putting in septic and denitrification systems. ,A M <br /> Mr.Hauck stated that he felt a good number would be in the range of 120. He stated that this 01 <br /> y y <br /> year the number is high and should slow down text year. <br /> A� <br /> There was discussion about when the cap is set at October Town Meeting,it should be 11 <br /> effective January 1,2000. k IF <br /> Thomas Analetto commented that if you add up the previous 3 years,you get a number of 95 <br /> permits per year and to select the number of 120,you are going against the process you are <br /> trying to aim for,which is limiting the number of permits. <br /> �s <br /> t <br /> It��:� <br />