Laserfiche WebLink
r�.. ..------r-�r-•— --.rw�—r---T.Y..rr-wr----�� r- r ..w+ r 4 +�GF -.W'ri� - ,T.�� r <br /> Ar- <br /> j sM <br /> 11 � <br /> Where was discussion concerning the exempt projects. <br /> R• <br /> J, <br /> Mr.Ronald Bonvie,Developer,stated that he has a concern with an open Space` <br /> Development Flan and getting it if he is only allowed a small number of permits. t <br /> Mr.Bonvie also noted that with special permit licenses,it would seem that something would <br /> have to make it totally clear and clarify what is exempt and what is not exempt and that the <br /> permits'Issued to those exemptions are not included in the calculation and that should be � <br /> totally clear. He noted that one of the best by-Laws you could issue is one of the clearest. �' <br /> Upon questioning by Mr.Bonvie,there was discussion.concerning OSID projects and age- `' r <br /> �r <br /> restricted facilities. { 14� <br /> Mr.Fudala commented on setting the cap number at 100 and exempt age-restricted projects <br /> for 55 and over,exempt oSID projects,and clarify that those things that are exempt under <br /> the state law don't count towards the cap number. t� <br /> Thomas Analetto commented that he feels the -law is �by already clear and he doesn't believe it <br /> needs to be rewritten. <br /> There was discussion concerning the number to choose for the cap and also what would be <br /> exempt and how to exempt. In addition,there was discussion as to the by-law and how <br /> specific it should be. <br /> Mr.Fred Wbite,Builder,suggested that the Planning Board go with a number and then <br /> review the number in a year to determine how it is doing and it can always be amended <br /> Beverly Dane commented that she has a problem setting a number that is essentially higher <br /> than the average for the last 3-4 years if the goal is to slow growth.. She noted that the <br /> average has been 95 for the last few years and she would suggest wffing the number at 95. <br /> C Bal�arin'questioned the members what their suggestion for the number would be <br /> ►rcri <br /> and the members responded as follows: <br /> Beverly Kane 95 <br /> Martine Mei'Jerin � <br /> g 95(with exemptions of oSID&age-restricted) +, <br /> James Dorgan 120 <br /> Dennis B 100(with exemptions of oSID&age-restricted) <br /> Matthew Malone 100(with exemptions of oSID&age-restricted) <br /> Nk <br /> otY n to aq Growth MIMAgEment B law Number at 100: =�I►. <br /> -law- <br /> Chairman Balzarini asked for a motion to be made to set the number. <br /> Mr.James Dorgan made a motion to set the number for the Growth <br /> Management Bylaw Amendment at 100 with the following two exemptions: <br /> oSID Pro' and Projects which are Age Restricted of 55 and over. Also #t � <br /> J� J g <br /> •r <br /> included in the Amendment would be clarification/explanation that units that ;;di <br /> 3,a � <br /> are exempted through Mass general laws are not counted towards that number <br /> --units that are exempted by Chapter 40. x <br /> Motion seconded by Matthew Malone. <br /> yi l <br />