Laserfiche WebLink
d— <br /> department has a book that lists all the town meeting actions on roads back to the 1830s <br /> and there is no indication that the town meeting took any action. Mr. Dorgan indicated <br /> that j ust because something is on a plan, and that plan has been filed, doesn't mean it's <br /> been accepted by the town as a road. Town records are what should be used. Mr. <br /> Creedon indicated that the two different sets of plans were done by two different <br /> engineering companies: one in 1962 b Hayes Corporation and one in 1973 b WhitneyY y � y <br /> and Bassett surveyors(both of which do not exist any longer). Per Mr. Fudala,in the <br /> minutes when the plan was approved,was the boards' consulting engineer(who at that <br /> time was Phil Holmes)information that he had checked to see if it was a town way; it <br /> was determined to not be a town way;therefore the plans were signed. Mr. Creedon <br /> feels the lots in questions were mistakenly excluded because they did not have access. <br /> Mr. Creedon didn't think frontage was an issue; the board does think it is a frontage <br /> issue. Not all lots meet the frontage issue in the subdivision according to Mr. Creedon. <br /> Mr. Fudala responded that this is a cluster subdivision which has different frontage <br /> requirements(60 or 65' since 1979). Mr. Creedon thought that was if it was on a curve, <br /> not a straight. Mr. Fudala responded there is a separate frontage requirement for a curve <br /> and a separate requirement for a cluster subdivision. Mr. Fudala told.Mr. Creedon that a <br /> modified Definitive Plan needs to be filed with the Town Clerk. Mr. Creedon asked <br /> what the process was to modify a Definitive Plan? Mr. Fudala informed Mr. Creedon <br /> that he needed to look in the subdivision regulations for the process to modify a <br /> Definitive Plan. Mr. Rowley told Mr. Creedon that the modification would be to remove <br /> the notation"not a buildable lot". If the change is a simple change to material lot lines, <br /> all that is required is a form A. He only needs to show the lots affected and use the Land <br /> Court Standards. Mr. Dorgan indicated if there is access on East Way,then they will <br /> need a variance. Mr. Creedon has been before the Zoning Board of Appeals, it was <br /> denied without prejudice because it was a non Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Creedon <br /> wants to know what he should do? Planning Board requirement is clear: remove the <br /> notation. Mr. Rowley wondered why the notation was on the plan. NIr. Fudala stated <br /> that there was not adequate frontage. Twenty feet(20')on East way is not acceptable; <br /> there was frontage, but not on a road that net the standards. The Planning Board will <br /> have to review frontage and waive the zoning requirement which gets back to the two- <br /> step process of creating a new lot that doesn't now exist. <br /> Definitive Plan <br /> Applicant: Steve Giatrelis/Cape&Islands Engineering <br /> Location: Route 130,Assessors Map 26,Block 8 <br /> Request; Signature of 2-lot Definitive Plan. Rescheduled from November 17, 1999. <br /> Chairman John Kuchinski returned @ 8:20 P <br /> Mr. Fudala spoke with John Slavinski this afternoon. Mr. Slavinski still does not have a <br /> covenant,hasn't heard from the applicant, and has not been aid b them. Continued for <br /> pp s p y <br /> signature to the 1 2/1 5199 meeting. <br /> Jot <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> .�i <br />