Laserfiche WebLink
were provided for review. There was discussion regarding the drainage system. Mr. Rowley <br /> recommended that the two drainage systems be isolated. Mr. Fudala noted that it would be <br /> reviewed by the ZBA. <br /> Mr. Rowley summarized his May 20 letter regarding the application. Mr. Rowley referenced the <br /> need for the street layout to be bounded and added that regulations required 3.5 inches of asphalt <br /> whereas the plan depicted just 3 inches. Arrows needed to be corrected and the waiver also <br /> needed to be corrected. Road base material must be defined and the cross section of the <br /> waterway needed to be laid out and stone in the bioswale identified. Mr. Bunker responded that <br /> the applicant would be willing to make the necessary changes. The correction to the waiver must <br /> read 60 feet to 50 feet. <br /> Mr. Cummings reported that Plan/Design Review recommended fencing around the dumpster <br /> and relocation of the durnpster, Mr. Bunker confirmed that the dupster had been relented <br /> away from the building and included an enclosure. 'There was also a question about chipper use <br /> during the weekend. Realtor Steve Madda reported that the new owners planned not to chip or <br /> screen on Sundays, with sporadic usage on Saturdays- <br /> Mr-r_ Fudala referenced a letter received corn Building Inspector Mike Mendoza and read a note <br /> regarding the approval of the landscape plan. Mr. Fudala noted that a road covenant would be <br /> needed with plans. 1r. Bunker noted that the roadway was part of the site plan but was basically <br /> driveway. Mr. Fudala.responded that it was a subdivision road. Mr. Fudala indicated that a <br /> provisional vote could be taken that would fulfill Mr_ Rowley's recommendations and the <br /> provision of a covenant. Vice Chair waygan referenced the second paragraph of the Building <br /> Commissioner's letter and modification to allow the building and activity but Mr. Fudala <br /> responded that the Planning Board could address only the subdivision. <br /> The public was invited to comment. Shari Bergeron, Treasurer of the abutting homeowners' <br /> association expressed interest in the plans as they received only a letter regarding the project. <br /> The vice Chair noted that the Planning Board could address only the lines of the property. There <br /> was discussion regarding the 4 acres owned by the Association that abutted the property. <br /> Clarifications to the plan were provided. Where was no additional public comment. <br /> MOTION: Mr. B rini made a motion to close the public hearing. Mr. I ooharian <br /> seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Two waivers had been requested regarding the radius and change from a circular turnaround to a <br /> T turnaround. Mr. Rowley stated that the T turnaround would be acceptable provided the <br /> property was to be used as shown on the plan. <br /> MOTto : Mr. Balza nni made a notion to reduce a radius from 60 to 50 feet* Mr. <br /> Kooharian seconded the motion. All rioted unanimously. <br /> MOTION: Mr. Bal arini made a motion to construct a paved T instead of a paved circle. <br /> Mr. I ooharian seconded the motion. AH voted unanimously. <br /> 2 <br />