Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> with similar expertise to be advised about questions to ask about other aspects of the project. Ms. <br /> Senatori of the Cape Cod Commission responded Chart technical staff is available to assist with any <br /> questions regarding land use, natural resources and economic development and recommended that all <br /> parties meet., possibly at bi-weekly meetings. The Chair stated the Boards preference that the entire <br /> Board be allowed to attend such mee ings as a group. Ms. Senatori responded that it would be at the <br /> Board's discretion.. Chairman.w ygan asked that llrfs. Richardson be invited to Mend the next meeting <br /> on January 5 to discuss the financial ompo of the project. Mr. Fudala noted that the Board must also <br /> discuss the additional studies, such as wildlife, since Mr. Storrs is working with a deadline to get the <br /> development agreement filed. Mr. Storrs reported that he is seeking a deadline extension. Chairman <br /> waygan stated that Mashpee Commons could still file the development agreement application while the <br /> Board reviews the RFP topic by topic. Mr. Fudala stated that the wildlife and habitat assessment is not <br /> typically a.condition under the Planning Board ByLaw and-Mr. Cannon responded that he could <br /> investigate it ftuther at the Cape Cod Commi sion. Mr. Storrs questioned whether the Board was familiar <br /> with the list of the 12 major subjects reviewed by the Cape Cod Commission .PP and emphasized the <br /> need for the Board to be familiar with the minimum performance standards. Mr. Moms further stated that <br /> Cape Cod Commission representatives from each area attended meetings one year ago to discuss each of <br /> the rewired areas. The Chair questioned the availability of the red line copies of the RPP marked April <br /> 261) 2010 and Ms. Senatori indicated that she could check on it. A discussion ensued regarding the old <br /> version versus the new version with Mr. Storrs stating that the-older version is not relevant. The <br /> Commission will send copies of the April 26 version. <br /> Nor. Fudala will work on a red line version of the traffic component.of the 1 FP with Mr. Storrs prior to the <br /> next meeting. Mr. Storrs was invited to attend the next meeting. <br /> TOWN ROAD TAKINGS <br /> Cape-give-Board members signed the plans. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> Comprehensive Plan <br /> Survey Update-Mr. FudaJa reported that he is coming t download the data and has completed <br /> 2 of the Town. Mr. Fu ala will re-send the survey results Pj F to the Planning Board. <br /> Bound Review of sting Goat andObjectives-Mr. Fudla recommended Focusing on the four <br /> areas of Affordable Housing, Health& Human Services, Economic Development and Open Space, <br /> Recreation& Agriculture, all of which have had staff input. Mr. Fud la stated that the Local <br /> Comprehensive Plan was developed for 1lashpee and adopted by the Piaing Board, approved by Town <br /> Mining and certified by the Cape Cod Commission. The LCP is a requirement of the Cape Cod <br /> Commission Act and covers many areas, including 5 major required elements. The Planning Board is <br /> considered the Local Planning Committee and is charged with developing and approving the <br /> Comprehensive Plan prior to seeking Town l eering support.and Cape Cod Commission certification, <br /> Certification from the Co ssion allows developments of regional impact to be held accountable to the <br /> town's Comprehensive Plan and for the town to be included in a three party agreement. finally, tows <br /> would have been allowed to charge impact fees for such projects but the Supreme Court rejected the fees. <br /> Mr. Fudala reported that he was advised that the zoning bylaw in ref to development agreements <br /> must be brought into conformance with the updated regional policy plans standards for development <br /> agreements in order to participate in development agreements. fir. Fudala forwarded the bylaw to Ms. <br /> Senatori to find out any differences that wine updating. The Chair recommended that the issue be <br /> added to next meeting's agenda, Public comment has been considered when updating the LCP and the <br /> current version was initiated with a public opinion survey in 1992. Neighborhood meetings were <br /> 6 <br />