Laserfiche WebLink
the proposed easements being created to be granted to the <br /> owners . He suggested the proposed spaces be pushed b 'cl . <br /> Attorney McIlhinney agreed that in light of the <br /> discrepancy between the paved area and the layout said <br /> proposed spaces could be extended. <br /> At this, point -the Chairman- asked for public comment, <br /> there being none., the Board reviewed the draft Decision <br /> prepared and distributed by the Town Planner. <br /> Findings: <br /> Less than 1 increase in the area of any particular <br /> use, a-nd will not be subject to current zoning. <br /> All changes are within the confines of the original <br /> project area. <br /> Under the provisions of the applicable zoning, them <br /> is a minimum open space requirement of 2-acres . Applicant <br /> is providing -acres for open space. <br /> 41 residences could have been allowed under <br /> applicable zoning ba-sed upon the upland area of the <br /> project . <br /> The permit, modification #1 , currently calls for 217 <br /> units . Applicant is proposing an increase to 223 units . <br /> The proposed plan and parking issues are referenced. <br /> The proposed 1 -un-its will require two spaces per unit for <br /> a total of -parking spaces are required by zoning. The <br /> proposed plan shows a total of -parking spaces. <br /> t this point Thomas O' Hara expressed his concern for <br /> the remote location of the parking spaces, asking if they <br /> could be- reconfigured closer to the units for safety <br /> reasons . <br /> The Town Planner suggested Applicant consider parallel <br /> parking spaces. <br /> The Chairman recognized Bruce Besse who spore to the <br /> grade differences, approximately 3-ft . , between the road <br /> and the parking area . He stated retaining walls would be <br /> needed to support parallel parking. Also, lame berms <br /> 4 <br />